Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Help for 2004 S4

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 16, 2004 | 11:36 AM
  #1  
vananron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default Help for 2004 S4

I need assistance. I have a 2004 S4, and I want to start making some modifications, but I am looking at the Forced Induction kind. I have searched everywhere and I cannot find a company that works on the New V8 S4 for FI. I know that this car has a HUGE amount of potential, I mean the car puts out 344 HP, but I look under the car, and the damn thing has 4 cats on it!?!?!?!? Plus it has a crappy air box system on it. I beleive that if I kept it NA, I would be able to get close to 100HP per liter. But since it has a 10:1 comp. I want to get a low boost FI setup on it. If anyone has ideas, shoot them my way
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2004 | 11:44 AM
  #2  
Scot's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 39
From: Nashville
Default

where the hell would you put a turbo or SC on that engine? it looks like it got shoehorned in there as it is..... is there room?
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2004 | 02:33 PM
  #3  
JettaGT's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Default

what about using the turbo setup from the rs6...its good for 450 hp stock..if i am correct, its the same engine..and then there would be potential to mod that after the two turbos are on...
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2004 | 06:11 AM
  #4  
vananron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default

The space is very tight. A supercharger would need to be of the screw nature, and be on top of the engine, with an obvious hood change. The turbo kit from the RS6 will not fit in the engine bay. I did manage to find out that there are people out there that have attained 100 HP per liter NA with this engine. After all, it does have 40 valves, and it has a high redline for a V8. I will say this though, this enging is almost as rev-happy as the S2000, all things considered. I will say the RPM "climb" is astonishing.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2004 | 06:17 PM
  #5  
jwkim's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,235
Likes: 0
From: Seoul
Default

not enough room in engine bay. I dont think any FI will fit without MAJOR modification.

I would say stay in NA
Good intake,header,exhaust,chip should give decent hp!
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #6  
Mindcore's Avatar
Former Moderator
25 Year Member
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,175
Likes: 0
From: Erock is da shizzle
Default

Using this forum is mental, but there is a lot of information there, I've seen posts where people have went FI on thier S8's it may be a good start

http://forums.audiworld.com/a8/
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2004 | 08:00 PM
  #7  
jwkim's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,235
Likes: 0
From: Seoul
Default

S8 has plenty of engine room..

Engine room in new S4(b6) was very tight that Audi had to put chain timing belt to rear of the engine to fit under B6 engine room.

Also member of Audiworld.com here
owned two A4s
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 07:36 AM
  #8  
vananron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default

A screw setup would go on top of the engine, and the only mod that I would see is a hood with a cowl setup? Not too major. My plan is to change the exhaust on the cat-back portion, and the intake, plus have two removable straight pipes, to cancel 2 of the cats on it. These mods bring me about 42 wheel HP on this car. That just shows the amount of airflow restrictions on it. Also, I have already given the car a 72 pound diet, and plan on changing rims and tires, which will save me another 70 pounds or so.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 09:58 AM
  #9  
BPUKiller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

If you wanted to mod a car the B6 S4 is not one to play with. I've learned my lesson, modding German cars is too much money for too little performance gains, and you are talking to a guy who has had a B5 S4.

Sam
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 11:45 AM
  #10  
NS2000X's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Default

Originally Posted by vananron,Sep 20 2004, 10:36 AM
A screw setup would go on top of the engine, and the only mod that I would see is a hood with a cowl setup? Not too major. My plan is to change the exhaust on the cat-back portion, and the intake, plus have two removable straight pipes, to cancel 2 of the cats on it. These mods bring me about 42 wheel HP on this car. That just shows the amount of airflow restrictions on it. Also, I have already given the car a 72 pound diet, and plan on changing rims and tires, which will save me another 70 pounds or so.
Do you think you could get a belt down to something to drive a screw type SC? It has got to be TIGHT at the back of that engine bay.

I have a 3.0 and I can just imagine what it would be like in there with an additional two cyclinders.

NS2000X
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KDL323
Introductions
22
Sep 18, 2007 06:31 PM
under-rated
Car and Bike Talk
18
Nov 20, 2004 06:46 PM
Asura
Car and Bike Talk
8
Aug 9, 2004 11:18 PM
steve c
Car and Bike Talk
31
May 24, 2004 01:37 PM
cloudnine
Car and Bike Talk
18
Jul 24, 2002 09:27 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:54 PM.