Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Interesting new Combustion Engine

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 09:09 PM
  #1  
jackalope's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
From: Brazoria
Default Interesting new Combustion Engine

http://www.rotoblock.com/


its a really interesting idea, but kinda curious about reliability as well as power...


edited to hotlink
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 05:22 AM
  #2  
no_really's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
From: City
Default

vaporware. The thing is overly complex, has no apparent advantage over a conventional engine design, and apparently doesn't even run.

I'm not holding my breath on this one.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 05:59 AM
  #3  
TSX Hokie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default

It still reciprocates; I don't see the point. The primary flaw with reciprocating piston engines is how much energy you have to expend to constantly fight the inertia of your pistons. With fuel cell technology only a couple decades away from full practicality, why bother trying to re-invent the internal combustion engine?

The fuel cell, since it is an electrochemical process, is not limited to a Carnot efficiency. A fuel cell can theoretically be 100% efficient, since it doesn't require a heat source or sink. In practice, its not that simple, but we are getting there.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 09:14 AM
  #4  
vader1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,950
Likes: 474
From: MAHT-O-MEDI
Default

I still think a rotary is a sweet design superior in many respects to piston design but the gas milage on those things is horrible. Renesis design was hyped as solving gas milage problems but that was another Mazda "exaggeration".
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #5  
KMak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default

I don't get it... according to the diagram, when the gas is lit, both the pistols move away equally.. shouldn't that pretty much cancel out the rotating motion? how do they get it to turn one way?
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 06:35 PM
  #6  
steven975's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: Vienna, VA
Default

yes, they move away, but they must also come back. it is that reciprocation that puts a limit on efficiency. the piston being "pulled back" soaks up some power.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 11:14 PM
  #7  
temin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Metro Boston
Default

Originally Posted by vader1,Jun 24 2005, 09:14 AM
I still think a rotary is a sweet design superior in many respects to piston design but the gas milage on those things is horrible. Renesis design was hyped as solving gas milage problems but that was another Mazda "exaggeration".
I'm not sure how it's really an exaggeration.

Surely the RX-8 gets crap for mileage like the RX-7, but they really aren't simliar platforms.

I don't have cd numbers handy, but I'd be willing to bet the RX-7 is lower. The 7 is surely lighter than the 8. And the 7 was turbocharged.

I'm guessing per unit gasoline, the Renesis power output is higher.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 07:31 AM
  #8  
Av8ing1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Carlsbad
Default

I don't see any comparison between the Rotoblock and the rotary engine. The Rotoblock is still a reciprocating engine just arranged in a four piston per connecting rod arrangement (sort of via disk and concentric shafts). Anyway it
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UH-60DRIVER
S2000 Forced Induction
3
Jun 24, 2016 06:55 PM
sahtt
Car and Bike Talk
27
Oct 22, 2008 08:27 PM
Jwslick
S2000 Talk
13
Jul 12, 2008 11:46 PM
NYC
S2000 Under The Hood
0
May 22, 2003 12:47 PM
WhiteS2k
S2000 Under The Hood
10
Sep 27, 2001 03:59 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:16 AM.