Look at the True Delta
Originally Posted by villain2000,Feb 15 2010, 04:51 PM
You know what I find most amusing about this post? 10 years ago, you couldnt even say Ford and Honda in the same breath.
**Just shy of ten years ago I passed over buying an Accord to buy a Contour SVT. I don't regret the choice.
Originally Posted by villain2000,Feb 15 2010, 04:51 PM
You know what I find most amusing about this post? 10 years ago, you couldnt even say Ford and Honda in the same breath.
Originally Posted by zachismisitok,Feb 15 2010, 08:57 PM
and 20 years before that, u could say it for the opposite reasoning, i dont see big deal
Originally Posted by rockville,Feb 15 2010, 08:24 PM
Well you could but it was usually to say I'm dumping my Ford to buy a Honda
*
*Just shy of ten years ago I passed over buying an Accord to buy a Contour SVT. I don't regret the choice.
**Just shy of ten years ago I passed over buying an Accord to buy a Contour SVT. I don't regret the choice.
Originally Posted by villain2000,Feb 16 2010, 04:50 AM
Good point. I guess I'm just excited about Fords progress and the fact that others are finally seeing it. I have been crowing about it now for the last 4 years.
The mileage stated in the article (27/33) is on the low side, we have a '09 Fit sport that averages 36 mpg combined which seems to be the norm according to other Fit owners I have talked too. On long highway stretches it easily gets 40 mpg and is roomy and handles very well for a econo. box.
Originally Posted by Incubus,Feb 14 2010, 02:41 PM
Well, they say the Fit does not have iPod integration. My wife's 2009 Fit does have this. I know it doesn't mean much, but how accurate is the rest?
Cargo volume can be measured many different ways, especially with a hatch. These numbers cannot reliably be compared from manufacturer or even model to model within the same manufacturer. So I'm a little hesitant to even provide them.
I had a 1996 Ford Contour SE for a number of years. The suspension was even firmer than that in the later SVT, the handling was excellent, and few engines is sub-$20k cars have ever sounded better. A much more solid car than the Mazda Protege5 I bought next. But thanks to an engineering defect the engine lost compression in three cylinders at 66k miles.
Originally Posted by mkaresh,Feb 24 2010, 09:55 AM
I operate TrueDelta. I generally get this information from the manufacturer's list of features. If they say only "USB input," I enter this. But in many such cases this does provide iPod integration. Because of the lack of clear information, I currently assign the same value to a "USB input" and "iPod integration."
Cargo volume can be measured many different ways, especially with a hatch. These numbers cannot reliably be compared from manufacturer or even model to model within the same manufacturer. So I'm a little hesitant to even provide them.
I had a 1996 Ford Contour SE for a number of years. The suspension was even firmer than that in the later SVT, the handling was excellent, and few engines is sub-$20k cars have ever sounded better. A much more solid car than the Mazda Protege5 I bought next. But thanks to an engineering defect the engine lost compression in three cylinders at 66k miles.
Cargo volume can be measured many different ways, especially with a hatch. These numbers cannot reliably be compared from manufacturer or even model to model within the same manufacturer. So I'm a little hesitant to even provide them.
I had a 1996 Ford Contour SE for a number of years. The suspension was even firmer than that in the later SVT, the handling was excellent, and few engines is sub-$20k cars have ever sounded better. A much more solid car than the Mazda Protege5 I bought next. But thanks to an engineering defect the engine lost compression in three cylinders at 66k miles.








