Mercedes under-rates the SL600
05-17-2004, 07:59 AM
#13
Originally posted by Mikko
Your mom needs a 500hp car?
I love the completely ironic, idiotic badging - SL stands for "Sports & Leicht".. Sports and Light. For a car that weighs twice that of a Mini-Cooper S, not far from a Cayenne S truck. The SL600 might be a fast boat, but it's still a boat.
Your mom needs a 500hp car?
I love the completely ironic, idiotic badging - SL stands for "Sports & Leicht".. Sports and Light. For a car that weighs twice that of a Mini-Cooper S, not far from a Cayenne S truck. The SL600 might be a fast boat, but it's still a boat.
What does the SL500 have then? Not more than ultra-race cars like Impreza STI and Evo I presume. lol.
05-20-2004, 03:19 PM
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: freeport
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
11.9? I would be surprised, but other mags have posted as low as 11.6, and a 0-60 of 3.6
that is easily supercar territory (acceleration wise)
I love how the car is virtually a sleeper compared to the sl500....little v12 badge and slight body enhancements.
I'd take it, but for that kind of money, i'd go used gt2 any day of the week.
that is easily supercar territory (acceleration wise)
I love how the car is virtually a sleeper compared to the sl500....little v12 badge and slight body enhancements.
I'd take it, but for that kind of money, i'd go used gt2 any day of the week.
05-20-2004, 06:16 PM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda
Posts: 4,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how can you guys say that the times on this car may be wrong??
heck the E55 is faster than a Murcielago from 60-140, and that is a fact
is that hard to believe too?
heck the E55 is faster than a Murcielago from 60-140, and that is a fact
is that hard to believe too?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post