Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

MS3 latest dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 09:52 PM
  #11  
liquid_helix136's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,289
Likes: 12
Default

^^ Thanks, learn something new everyday!
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 11:02 PM
  #12  
Vik2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,210
Likes: 5
From: Behind You
Default

well it's FWD... got torque steer, and weigh over 3000 lbs....




















j/k dude, nice car and I'd love to have one as DD.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 12:50 AM
  #13  
dewey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
Default

what other mods do you have to make it up to 255 whp? not just intake .. lol
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 02:45 AM
  #14  
Abdizzle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Default

These things give STi's/Evo's trouble stock for stock and simple mod's like this make a huge difference. No idea how S2000 owners think they can pull on these from a roll. I got slaughtered by one when my Evo was near stock.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 04:13 AM
  #15  
fusionchickenleg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Default

yah my buddy's ms3 got a CAI and before after dyno without any tune etc. and picked up 30whp and 24wtq, sounds great too
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 06:12 AM
  #16  
07RioS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 2
From: Woodstock, GA
Default

Originally Posted by dewey,Oct 24 2009, 12:50 AM
what other mods do you have to make it up to 255 whp? not just intake .. lol
I'm afraid so... The stock intake on the ms3 is so restrictive... they usually pick up 25whp with an SRI.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 06:27 AM
  #17  
hyperpm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,396
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by dewey,Oct 24 2009, 12:50 AM
what other mods do you have to make it up to 255 whp? not just intake .. lol
yup just intake.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 06:46 AM
  #18  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by liquid_helix136,Oct 23 2009, 08:09 PM
wow look at that drop in power after 5.5k what is the redline on those cars? Maybe im noobing it up, but i'd never heard of a car thats faster when you short shift
my WRX is the same way, gotta shift a little early to stay within the powerband
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 07:36 AM
  #19  
replica's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

test drove a MS3 once...I really wanted to like it, but the early power dive killed it for me. They should have designed it to be able to pull hard to at least 7 grand, even if that meant a bit less torque/HP in the midrange. It's a sport compact, not a diesel U-Haul truck
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2009 | 08:38 AM
  #20  
budgy's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 863
Likes: 56
Default

if MS3 owners didn't care about low/midrange torque they would have bought a Honda. Not everyone wants an 8000+RPM screamer as their daily driver. So they could have made the head breathe better and put a bigger turbo on it, kill the drivability of the car and made it produce that kind of torque to 6500RPM then it would be even more expensive, not a lot of usable torque in the lower rev range and we would have a 350 horsepower FWD hatch.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:28 PM.