Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

New Corvette makes Supra and others a dud.

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-18-2019, 09:36 AM
  #61  

 
engifineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 5,692
Received 1,213 Likes on 938 Posts
Default

Well most of the info is probably questionable at best since a lot is speculation. So it may be more rear biased
Old 04-18-2019, 11:23 AM
  #62  

 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,389
Received 266 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

There isn't a single midengined (rear mid engine) car I can think of that has a 50/50 weight distribution. For reference my Cayman is 45/55.

Sidenote: a lot of BRZ enthusiasts are under the impression their car has a front mid-engine design. In fact I think Subaru (or Toyota) actually said it was. Annnnnnd, it's definitely not. Bleh.
Old 04-18-2019, 12:28 PM
  #63  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k
There isn't a single midengined (rear mid engine) car I can think of that has a 50/50 weight distribution. For reference my Cayman is 45/55.

Sidenote: a lot of BRZ enthusiasts are under the impression their car has a front mid-engine design. In fact I think Subaru (or Toyota) actually said it was. Annnnnnd, it's definitely not. Bleh.
I don't know myself because I'm not a big BRZ enthusiast, but it should be (only being 2 cylinders in length) Should be a snap. I know being a flat 4 the weight should be lower center of gravity so that's helpful.
Old 04-18-2019, 02:29 PM
  #64  
Registered User

 
rob-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,657
Received 170 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k
There isn't a single midengined (rear mid engine) car I can think of that has a 50/50 weight distribution. For reference my Cayman is 45/55.

Sidenote: a lot of BRZ enthusiasts are under the impression their car has a front mid-engine design. In fact I think Subaru (or Toyota) actually said it was. Annnnnnd, it's definitely not. Bleh.
That slightly rear balance has up sides. The hang up on 50/50 perfection has always been something I didn't fully understand
Old 04-19-2019, 05:38 AM
  #65  
CMK

 
CMK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 671
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

According to this image, the BRZ is definitely not mid-engine.

Old 04-19-2019, 06:49 AM
  #66  
Jub

 
Jub's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,507
Received 392 Likes on 312 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engifineer
So now onto more of a geek rant. Why not right?

So why does it matter if a car is front or rear mid engine? To the average consumer, who know little to nothing about handling dynamics and geometry, they just see the engine behind the driver and that it is mid engine and assume it MUST be better (I am honestly not sure how much moving the engine to the back of the vette improves its handling by itself). But in my understanding, assuming both are mid engine layouts, front vs rear affects

So this will either spawn a big car geek discussion about these things or not ... but I find it very interesting
We're trying to apply objective logic here to something that is a more subjective choice for the average consumer. Rear mid-engine cars are clearly different than most normal daily drivers. It is usually reflected in the design and shows in the styling of the car. Not many (if any) rear-mid cars are marketed or thought of as daily drivers. I think the Corvette is marketed as and makes a more practical daily than a Cayman for example. Because of that and the inherent design, the Cayman just looks and feels more special to the average consumer and says Porsche on it. When hard parking, you also pop the hatch and not the hood which gives you street cred, or so I'm told.
Old 04-19-2019, 09:30 AM
  #67  

 
Driven's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,045
Received 45 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engifineer
But they should The S2k is a mid engine car just like any other mid engine car. Weight is evenly balanced because of that engine placement and that is the main concern. I have heard of front mid engine for years, it is not all that uncommon of a term at all. The only reason it is more commonly referred to as behind the driver is that there are likely many more mid engine cars with that config. Does not make it correct in any form though to assume front engine does not mean mid engine. The common user not knowing the proper definitions does not make them any more correct.
One side of your discussion is being pedantic.

If I ask someone for a basket of fruits, and they bring me bell peppers and a pumpkin, I might be disappointed -- despite them being technically correct.



Old 04-20-2019, 11:48 AM
  #68  

 
Bullwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,563
Received 566 Likes on 396 Posts
Default

weight distribution F/R:

s2000 - 49/51
Audi R8 - 44/56
Lotus Exige - 38/62
Ferrari 488 - 41.5/58.5

The R8 should actually have more rear weight bias with its configuration, but doesn't because it's carrying extra weight up front from the AWD system.

It really is a bunch of semantics. For the vast majority of those communicating, when something is "mid-engine," it is sitting behind the driver.

The s2000 and c7 corvette should be considered FM/R - front-mid.

911s are RR, but semantics again... they're really moving more and more to a mid-engine layout. A modern day 992 has a far different configuration from 911s of the 80's. The 911 GT3R racecar is a full mid-engine as far as i'm concerned.
Old 04-29-2019, 08:28 AM
  #69  

 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,389
Received 266 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

The 911 RSR is a mid-engine car. The GT3R is not.
Old 04-30-2019, 03:24 PM
  #70  

 
The Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: La Crescenta, CA
Posts: 58,426
Received 1,192 Likes on 918 Posts
Default

I'm getting a C8 vert. I think I'll wait a while, like I did with my 14 C7 vert (first year of the C7), first on sale in late 13. I pulled the trigger in Feb 14, after the initial stampede was over. I paid MSRP and $1,500 to have Montway enclosed ship it from Kerbeck Cadillac Chevrolet Buick GMC in Atlantic City, NJ to me in the LA area. A great car purchase experience. I'm going to go with Kerbeck again.

Last edited by The Raptor; 04-30-2019 at 03:31 PM.


Quick Reply: New Corvette makes Supra and others a dud.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:50 PM.