Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

The new Prelude!

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-11-2005, 06:47 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
VTEC_Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by slicksilver,Sep 11 2005, 06:31 PM
Have you ever thought that perhaps Toyota isn't good at making sports cars. Their sports cars have never garnered much respect, and most have been less than successful. It's one thing to make a boring but reliable Camry and quite another to make a 911.

Toyota is good at making appliances that transport people from A to B. They are bad at making cars that evoke passion.
i don't think that's a very good assessment. toyota is good at making good practical everyday cars because that is what they set their mission to do, and it is their priority. i'm sure if toyota's goal from the getgo was to make passion inspiring sportscars, they can do that as well. the bottom line is that when it comes to toyota sportscars, the company is only willing to expend certain amount of resources, and that limited resources is what yields the type of sportscars that they eventually produced. i'm sure if toyota was to divert more of their resources into making sportscars that will eventually sell at the price of a porsche 911, they will probably come up with a sportscar that will compete well with a 911 in terms of performance and passion inspiring. on the flip side, if porsche was given limited resources to produce a $25K-$35K sports car, how impressive do you think that sportscar will end up being??
Old 09-11-2005, 09:13 PM
  #22  
Registered User

 
Lice Locket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE=nalVle,Sep 11 2005, 04:58 PM] i disagree.
Old 09-12-2005, 02:59 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
nalVle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Danbury/New Haven, CT
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lice Locket,Sep 12 2005, 12:13 AM
You're logic makes no sense.

If Toyota came out w/ a Supra? They did make one, and it did not sell that well. It only got fame from The Fast and the Furious.

There's no S2000 commercials because commercials cost a lot of money, and Honda figures that it can't make enough money off of the car, so, they don't advertise it.

If Toyota is soon to take over the NUMBER ONE spot, what makes you think they need to make a sports car? In terms of a business decision, I think it was wise for Toyota to can the MR-S and the Celicas. They seem to enjoy good profits by getting rid of the last of their sports cars (2005 was the last year of the MR-S and Celica) and upping production in the economy cars. I think Toyota is doing fine not having any sports cars (unless you count the tC as a sports car).

The statement of being able to buy a $35k car and not worrying about gas prices: That's what the Lexus line of cars are for. You're right in that people won't stop buying sports cars because of gas prices, meaning that sports cars sales is gas-price independent. But, you forget that sports cars don't sell that well in the first place, so even when gas prices were under $2.00, sports cars never sold that well. I never implied that the getting rid of sports cars have anything to do with gas prices, I'm just saying that in general, sports cars don't sell well compared to the front-wheel-drive cars. If anything, FWD sports cars most likely sell better than RWD sports cars.
i know they already made one, try to stay with me. if they made a replacement right now, it would clean up. maybe f&f is accountable for a lot of the popularity it would get, but thats irrelevant. also, i doubt that honda's sole reason for not having a commercial for the s2000 is because of lack of funds.

in saying they 'need' a sports car, i wasn't saying its essential for more profit, i was merely saying that it would make them seem less economical-oriented. if they actually dont care about their lack of sports cars, then let them keep making econo-cars. lastly, of course fwd cars will sell better than rwd performance cars, because as stated in my PREVIOUS POST, enthusiasts dont make up the majority, and thats what toyota's whole lineup is all about.

my logic doesnt make sense...to you
-Chris
Old 09-13-2005, 01:02 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
VTEC_Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE=nalVle,Sep 12 2005, 02:59 PM] i know they already made one, try to stay with me.
Old 09-13-2005, 08:43 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
nalVle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Danbury/New Haven, CT
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VTEC_Junkie,Sep 13 2005, 04:02 AM
1. f&f, in general, appeals to the 16 to 24 age group, and a brand new supra priced at $35K will be unattainable for most of them. there are generally 2 groups who are in the market for sports cars: the young and single male (typically under 25), and the older affluent male whose kids are adults (typically 50+). now the former group typically cannot afford cars over $30K, and the latter would typically prefer prestigeous named brand cars that cost upwards of $50K. so there lies the problem with the $30-$40K japanese sports cars: there's just not a big enough of a market for them.

2. the reason for honda not making commercials for the s2k is not due to a lack of funds, but most likely due to the fact that the expense required for making and airing the commercials doesn't justify the projected increase in sales of the s2k.

3. fwd are generally more popular than rwd amongst consumers because fwds are generally less expensive than rwds due to less parts. furthermore, rwd vehicles has a greater need for traction control, which further ups the cost of the car. at the end of the day, cost and affordability will influence the majority's decision as to which cars to buy, not fwd vs. rwd.
ok, so bottom line i still think a supra replacement at $35k would clean up. with 350Z topping out at almost that much, and the s2000 with a hardtop in the same ballpark, i think it would have the edge in performance. we can speculate all we want, our opinions wont change.
-Chris
Old 09-13-2005, 11:50 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
mbilderback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Memphis
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But in the mid 90s, wasn't the Supra Turbo in the 60k range? Expecting a Supra to top out at 35k is a bit optimistic. I expect you'd be hard pushed to get a NA Supra for that, and you'll still be north of 50k for a Turbo.
Old 09-13-2005, 05:59 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
nalVle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Danbury/New Haven, CT
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mbilderback,Sep 13 2005, 02:50 PM
But in the mid 90s, wasn't the Supra Turbo in the 60k range? Expecting a Supra to top out at 35k is a bit optimistic. I expect you'd be hard pushed to get a NA Supra for that, and you'll still be north of 50k for a Turbo.
towards the end they were up in the 60s, but werent they sold for about 40k when they first came out? who knows what it will cost when it comes out, but itd be nice for it to be 40k.
-Chris
Old 09-14-2005, 12:00 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
VTEC_Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by nalVle,Sep 13 2005, 08:43 AM
ok, so bottom line i still think a supra replacement at $35k would clean up. with 350Z topping out at almost that much, and the s2000 with a hardtop in the same ballpark, i think it would have the edge in performance. we can speculate all we want, our opinions wont change.
-Chris
but that's not the point. i'm sure a new supra will excel in performance compared with an aging s2k and 350z, but it still doesn't change the fact that the market for a $35K japanese sportscar is small to begin with, plus now a new supra will have to compete with the 350Z, the s2k, and the rumored rx7, and we are back in the mid 1990's all over again. again, the main market for japanese sportscars tend to be the 16-25 year old single males, and unless these japanese car makers produce sportscars that are under $30K, then they will have a hard time getting sufficient buyers for their sportscars to make it a worthwhile investment. now the problem with a sub $30K sportscar is that they tend not to be that impressive performance-wise. for instance, a mazda mx5 can be had for under $30K, and even though the mx5 is a fun car to toss around, having a car that does 0-60 in high 6 to low 7 secs is really nothing to brag about. the other alternative is for these japanese car makers to produce a $35K-$40K sportscar that can outperform a c6 corvette, then maybe some of the older sportscar buyers who cannot afford a porsche may consider a japanese sportscar as an alternative to a corvette.
Old 09-14-2005, 11:06 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
nalVle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Danbury/New Haven, CT
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VTEC_Junkie,Sep 14 2005, 03:00 AM
the other alternative is for these japanese car makers to produce a $35K-$40K sportscar that can outperform a c6 corvette, then maybe some of the older sportscar buyers who cannot afford a porsche may consider a japanese sportscar as an alternative to a corvette.
bro thats exactly what im trying to SAY. my idea of a new supra should be a $35-40k sports car that would perform WITH a base c6 vette (not outperform, thats too much for a Supra). that would give, as you said, potential vette buyers an alternative. whats the problem? younger buyers would like it, and potentially older buyers would think its a bargain if it had good performance.
-Chris
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MegaTRon
Car and Bike Talk
198
07-27-2015 09:45 AM
Swift GT
Car and Bike Talk
50
09-09-2009 02:05 PM
Lice Locket
Car and Bike Talk
25
04-26-2005 11:57 PM
HondaGal
Car and Bike Talk
12
02-02-2002 04:16 AM



Quick Reply: The new Prelude!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:40 PM.