nsx weight distribution?
i understand the concept of a mid engine car, andi understand weight distribution.
most mid engine cars have the engine, way more to the front than the nsx does. it is almost right on top of the wheels. so how does it still get a good weight distribution? is there just a bunch of ballast in the front?
does anyone have anytechnical drawings or anything?
most mid engine cars have the engine, way more to the front than the nsx does. it is almost right on top of the wheels. so how does it still get a good weight distribution? is there just a bunch of ballast in the front?
does anyone have anytechnical drawings or anything?
911's have the engine behind the rear wheels and have very rear biased weight distributions but still get hailed as great handling cars. Same with the Lotus Elise. I believe that split is like 37/63. Weight distributions like that of the S2000, Miata, RX-7 & RX-8 (all 50/50 or really close) help handling but it's not the end all be all to it.
Originally Posted by Mr.E.G.,Nov 18 2005, 09:24 PM
i understand the concept of a mid engine car, andi understand weight distribution.
most mid engine cars have the engine, way more to the front than the nsx does. it is almost right on top of the wheels. so how does it still get a good weight distribution? is there just a bunch of ballast in the front?
does anyone have anytechnical drawings or anything?
most mid engine cars have the engine, way more to the front than the nsx does. it is almost right on top of the wheels. so how does it still get a good weight distribution? is there just a bunch of ballast in the front?
does anyone have anytechnical drawings or anything?
i thought the nsx was closer to 50/50. looks like i was wrong.
so riddle me this batman... a 50 50 weight distribution is the best way to go right? and with as much of the weight in the center, right?
thats what i have allways read.
so riddle me this batman... a 50 50 weight distribution is the best way to go right? and with as much of the weight in the center, right?
thats what i have allways read.
50/50 is generally considered to be the best way to go, yes. If all four tires have equal weights applied to them, it's generally assumed that the car will respond in a more confidence-inspiring way.
But as was previously noted regarding the 911, I think the 50/50 distribution thing can be offset by the drivetrain configuration in some cases.
But as was previously noted regarding the 911, I think the 50/50 distribution thing can be offset by the drivetrain configuration in some cases.
Originally Posted by Mr.E.G.,Nov 19 2005, 07:54 AM
i thought the nsx was closer to 50/50. looks like i was wrong.
so riddle me this batman... a 50 50 weight distribution is the best way to go right? and with as much of the weight in the center, right?
thats what i have allways read.
so riddle me this batman... a 50 50 weight distribution is the best way to go right? and with as much of the weight in the center, right?
thats what i have allways read.
http://www.ngnl.net/hall.pdf
The short of it is that 50-50 is best for steady state cornering, but going fast is sooo much more then being fast while not changing speeds while cornering. You exit speeds and weight bias under braking are improved with a rear weith bias. The 911 is extreme. But, most mid-engine cars are very close to optimal. There are a lot of resources on the web all about this subject.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by s2kpdx01,Nov 19 2005, 09:00 AM
The short of it is that 50-50 is best for steady state cornering, but going fast is sooo much more then being fast while not changing speeds while cornering. You exit speeds and weight bias under braking are improved with a rear weith bias. The 911 is extreme. But, most mid-engine cars are very close to optimal.

Hence mid-engine car in general is more steady and have higher threshold in corner entry and exit. With more weight in the rear to give rear tires traction, it allows moderate trailbraking on entry and putting more power down while exiting corner.
Originally Posted by s2kpdx01,Nov 19 2005, 07:00 AM
50-50 static weight distribution is not optimal. A weight bias towards the back is considered optimal.

I would argue that 50/50 weight distribution is optimal for a fun road-going car, but check out the weight distribution of top-level racing cars like F1 cars -- they all have rear-biased weight distributions, which helps both acceleration and braking. The downsides to a rear-biased weight distribution include power-on understeer and a tendency for the back end to let go in a big way when it lets go.
Steve








