Performance VS. Fun to Drive
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Menlo Park, CA
Originally Posted by mikey stone,Apr 21 2010, 12:39 PM
The S2000 is faster around the race track than the ITR, but the Type R is a lot more fun to drive.
No sarcasm intended, I've just never driven a Type-R.
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by Chris S,Apr 21 2010, 04:11 PM
I haven't driven a Type R, but I can't imagine it being more fun than an S2000 in any circumstance.
Using the gas pedal to induce oversteer is fun. Using the gas pedal to induce understeer, not so much.
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 45
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Elistan,Apr 12 2010, 09:38 PM
Am I being paid to drive? Then performance wins.
Am I driving for my own enjoyment? Then fun-to-drive wins.
Am I driving for my own enjoyment? Then fun-to-drive wins.
And who chooses between a Vette and a Porsche for car ownership? The vette's build quality is a fraction of that of similar year Porsches. My old '72 914 had better fit and finish than a C6.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Originally Posted by PedalFaster,Apr 21 2010, 03:31 PM
Using the gas pedal to induce oversteer is fun. Using the gas pedal to induce understeer, not so much.
I was driving an S2000 when I decided to try out a Type R for a few months...
It was fun the first few weeks but I started to miss driving the S2000 shortly after.
I remember the smile I had on my face when I bought another S2000 and took my first corner: I never had such a huge grin on my face. I remember saying to myself ''a corner in an S2000 is soooooooo much more enjoyable than one in an ITR''.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mistress Quickly
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
33
Mar 1, 2009 11:41 AM