Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Remember when I said...

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 11:59 AM
  #21  
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 332
From: Montana
Default

^^ditto me. I didn't care that it was a convertible. (would have preferred hard top)
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 12:17 PM
  #22  
rockville's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Aug 9 2010, 11:33 AM
There hasn't been a reasonable price rwd/irs coupe on the market for something like 12 years now.

Just another Jap car? In the sense that it's a similar formula to the 240Z and 240SX, maybe, but we only VERY RARELY get cars like that on the market, and those of us LOVE light weight, appreciate minimalism (I don't need 300+hp in a street car), and don't have $50k+ burning a hole in our pockets, it's an important car.

Cool car, if it comes in at 2800 lb. (preferably less) and more than 200hp, I'm most likely buying one.

Couldn't care less if it's on every corner or not, it pushes most of the right buttons with me.

But then, I bought an S2000 *in spite* of it's being a convertible, not because of it.
Kappa coupe was reasonably price (all 1500 that made it out the door before the line was killed).

The Mustang may not be IRS but it's good anyway.

Despite playing devil's advocate I do understand what you are saying.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #23  
EVAN&MONICA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 22,535
Likes: 0
From: Portlandia
Default

Im still a fan of the car but I have no for the Scion badge
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 01:29 PM
  #24  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

I was really really really looking forward to the Solstice Coupe, but at close to 3000 lb. in GXP trim, and with that interior, it didn't make a compelling enough case to sacrifice the S2000 for it. I suspect it also suffers from lack of usable storage space (though it *has* to be an improvement over the convertible versions!).

Mustang is good, but live-axle and over 3300 lb., too bulky, and sitting in the thing just doesn't do it for me *at all*. Feels like you're in a bunker or something.

All I've really wanted for a street car for some time now is a modern S13 240SX with decent power and decent looks. FT86 may be it. Nothing else in the market at the moment remotely interests me.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 01:34 PM
  #25  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Aug 9 2010, 01:33 PM
There hasn't been a reasonable price rwd/irs coupe on the market for something like 12 years now.

Just another Jap car? In the sense that it's a similar formula to the 240Z and 240SX, maybe, but we only VERY RARELY get cars like that on the market, and those of us LOVE light weight, appreciate minimalism (I don't need 300+hp in a street car), and don't have $50k+ burning a hole in our pockets, it's an important car.

Cool car, if it comes in at 2800 lb. (preferably less) and more than 200hp, I'm most likely buying one.

Couldn't care less if it's on every corner or not, it pushes most of the right buttons with me.

But then, I bought an S2000 *in spite* of it's being a convertible, not because of it.
If you're willing to accept that, why haven't you bought a Miata with built-in hard top? Similar power-to-weight ratio (it'll get there with bolt-ons), less weight, and both convertible and hard-top with a very stiff chassis to boot...
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 01:41 PM
  #26  
fishfryer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Default

But then, I bought an S2000 *in spite* of it's being a convertible, not because of it.
That's interesting, I would have NEVER considered the S2000 if it was a hardtop. It never crossed my mind that people would prefer a hard top. The same goes for the Boxster/Cayman, never would I consider buying a Cayman.

Well, I stand corrected, I hope for you guys they make this car and it comes in light and strong, hopefully it'll easily accept some mods and do whatever you guys need it to do. Me, I'll stick with sunshine, hot chicks, and feeling like I am on vacation every time I drive my S.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 02:12 PM
  #27  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy,Aug 9 2010, 01:34 PM
If you're willing to accept that, why haven't you bought a Miata with built-in hard top? Similar power-to-weight ratio (it'll get there with bolt-ons), less weight, and both convertible and hard-top with a very stiff chassis to boot...
I'd sooner get the ragtop Miata. The additional cost/weight/complexity of a retractable hardtop, I just *hate* the idea!

Wish they made a Miata coupe. And I wish they didn't look like they were on stilts with the stock suspension. Really awful stance from the factory, hard to look at!
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 03:40 PM
  #28  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

Stance is easy to change, especially when they cost relatively little in the used market.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 07:19 PM
  #29  
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 332
From: Montana
Default

Originally Posted by fishfryer,Aug 9 2010, 01:41 PM
That's interesting, I would have NEVER considered the S2000 if it was a hardtop. It never crossed my mind that people would prefer a hard top. The same goes for the Boxster/Cayman, never would I consider buying a Cayman.
Well, as a convertible it is heavier than if it was a coupe, it has less storage space, its noisier all the time (and not a nice engine exhaust note - -rather the sound of wind), it has very little insulation and it has more moving parts and is thus more complex. It's also a pain to take the car to the track. Most organizations and some tracks don't allow the S2000 to compete without an aftermarket rollbar. And despite what some people say, it's not a very desirable thing to cut up the interior to install a rollbar - not to mention the loss in legroom.

And I already had to replace the top once at 19,000 miles

In exchange I get the pleasure of putting the top down...which unfortunately for me is really only enjoyable in the fall and spring in NC...and never really that enjoyable on the highway.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 09:07 PM
  #30  
luder_5555's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Default

is there some reason why toyota can't just make a car with a new 2jz motor. i mean that motor was probably the only motor that toyota has ever made that truly gets enthusiasts excitied.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Italia
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
5
Dec 24, 2007 08:35 PM
anthonys2k
Site Info
1
Apr 15, 2005 08:41 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:37 PM.