Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

S2000 or STi?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 10:10 AM
  #21  
hondaBeater's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dparm,Nov 18 2008, 11:07 AM
ROFLMAO....you come on an S2000 site asking if you should get one? What do you honestly think people will say?
get sti, if you want a lesser car.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 10:26 AM
  #22  
GT_NFR's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 2007 Zx-10,Nov 18 2008, 03:02 PM
I like plenty of other cars, as long as they are true sports cars (sadly, there aren't many)
Your elitism attitude towards "true sports cars" never seizes to amuse me. Since your Rx-7 was originally designed as a "sports coupe" (second paragraph), aren't you being a little contradictive of your statement?

Also, when you start driving a viper ACR, then I'll stop calling you out on your "I'm awesome b/c I drive real sports cars" attitude.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 10:26 AM
  #23  
ts80's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Default

The STi was also one of my considerations when I was shopping for a new car.

I think the Subaru has more potential for outright speed, but RWD was a big factor for me. When I raced open-wheels they were always RWD and that's what I was most comfortable with and had the most fun in.

In the end the STi fell out of favor for me because of AWD and I was deciding between the S2000 and 350Z. I drove both and enjoyed the S2000 more.

In my opinion, fun factor doesn't always correlate with outright performance numbers. Everyone has different tastes, drive both for an hour and see which one you enjoy more...either is a great car, you'll be happy with whichever one you choose.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 06:15 AM
  #24  
rwheelz's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 118
From: Montana
Default

I own both cars, and the real answer is you need them both!

The S2000, though significantly slower, is much more fun and rewarding to drive. It will cost more to mod the S2000 as compared to the STI, but if you are going for a 400+ whp build on either car anyway, then go with the S2000.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 07:20 AM
  #25  
marrenr813's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 1
From: San Diego & Temecula
Default

STI = performance

S2K = way more fun to drive
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 07:23 AM
  #26  
Jacques79's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Default

Get a C5 Z06.

You can pick one up for 25K and I doubt you'll get bored of the power.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 07:24 AM
  #27  
nfty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Default

Performance
IMO, The S2000 is more of a driver's car. If you're still stuck in the "who makes the most power" stage of driver development, get the STi.

If you have evolved to the "skill > power" stage of driver development, get the S2K.

Practicality
The STi is having your cake and eating it too. You can bring 3 friends along and have more cargo capacity.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 09:31 AM
  #28  
EVAN&MONICA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 22,535
Likes: 0
From: Portlandia
Red face

We got an S2K for me and well prolly pick up an sti for Monica within the next year or so, best of both worlds
I like the S better personally its more fun. I think anyone whos driven both cars wouldnt argue that.
I beleive the STI is substancially quicker from the factory though.
$4$ for performance wise the S wins I think. For the same price of an STI you could get a S2K and turbo it giving it the advantage over the beefier 4WD

These are not facts just my opinions. I hope you make the choice that is right 4 you and makes you happy
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #29  
ace123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 3
Default

[QUOTE=lacrosseks29,Nov 16 2008, 03:15 PM] i love the s2k and sti. both of my good friends have and sti and a s2k and i love driving them both. i need help deciding which one i should get. Which one has a better engine with more potential? If i turbo a s2k will it beat a sti with a 30r or 35r? Which one would be cheaper to have it hold around 400whp or more? feel free to discuss other features. all posts will be appreciated. THanks.

PS: i don;t care about trunk room, winter season, two seats, or any stuff like that. Right now i only care about the performance of aftermarket mods for these cars. and im not buying new so the 08 sti is most defiantly out of the question, and cause its ugly.

Kinda my basic question is if i turboed a s2k and put a larger turbo in a sti- which would be a faster, more reliable, and overall a better car in terms of
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #30  
fusionchickenleg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Default

if i had 25k sitting around right now a c5z06 would be in my garage.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:18 PM.