Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

s2k vs. NSX

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 04:16 PM
  #11  
seanjohn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Dec 15 2009, 04:41 PM
For the same price, the S2000 will be in much better condition than the NSX. Ten years ago when I got my S2000 I was also looking at NSXes and the only ones I found under, IIRC, $45k had 50k+ miles, all the wear and tear you'd expect from such, collision damage, were in the snap ring failure range, etc.

A left-over, 0-mile, new S2000 should go for $27k or such, based on what people have reported here.

To get an NSX under $30k, you're talking '91 or '93 with 60k+ miles, based on a quick cars.com search. No telling what sort of condition those cars are in without seeing them in person, though.

If buying a car that old with that much mileage doesn't bother you - go for the NSX I'd say. I'd love to have one sitting next to the S2000 in the garage. But I'd only get one once I'm in the position to put down a lot more money for a MY02+ version. Or, at the minimum, at MY97+ version with the larger engine and 6spd transmission.
You make a good point, maybe I should go for the s2k and hunt for a NSX in 3 or 4 years when I have the s2k all paid off.

Something about that darned NSX though, I can't seem to shake it...
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 04:32 PM
  #12  
Saint_Spinner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles
Default

I thought the same. Yes the NSX interior (including the exterior...my opinion) is dated, but it makes a much, much better daily driver. Remember, I lived with both for a few years as a daily driver. Nice thing about the NSX is more torque for city daily driving...not as loud when just putting around, but screams when you open her up.

Ride is not as harsh, plush interior, auto air and etc. Roomier, more luggage space, but when I parked mine next to my coworker's S2K, surprisingly they're not too different in size. I always thought the NSX was larger...but its very close.

I sold mine with 160K on the odo. My S2k with 25K had more rattles (not alot mind you) than the NSX. The only thing that went were the door speakers and window regulator. Common issues with the NSX.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 04:46 PM
  #13  
kenstyle's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 3
Default

E46 M3
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #14  
Vik2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,210
Likes: 5
From: Behind You
Default

I'd choose Scuderia.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #15  
Steponme's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 1
Default

NSX hands down! Its drive is purely organic.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 05:53 PM
  #16  
Mark355's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 43
From: Troy, NY
Default

As much as I love my S, I'd take the NSX for the mid-engined layout.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #17  
ou818's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Default

Depends on what you want. If you want a car you can keep and cherish for a long time, both cars are great, but the NSX definately has an edge.

If you want to mod a car and see some decent returns, S2000 hands down. The NSX is expensive to mod, and the results aren't that great.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 06:16 PM
  #18  
jemje2006's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 803
Likes: 4
Default

leave NSX in the history.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 06:26 PM
  #19  
sprix!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

NSX> S2K
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 06:53 PM
  #20  
FearlessFife's Avatar
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,630
Likes: 51
From: Kansas City, MO
Default

BOTH
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 AM.