Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

So how fast is the GTR without launch control?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 09:13 PM
  #31  
Yellow_S's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Default

It doesn't matter if non-owners (myself included) hate or like the GT-R, their owners seem to be very ecstatic with the car, and like or dislike doesn't change anything.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #32  
OverBooster's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,585
Likes: 0
From: Roseville, CA
Default

Originally Posted by nightwalker,Dec 12 2008, 12:09 AM
and witnessed a white GT-R

I've also witnessed tons of C6 z06s
There, my friend is the flaw in your entire argument...your sample size. You witnessed "a" GTR and "tons" of Z06's. Anyone could make an erroneous conclusion (as you did) by forming an opinion off of one sample...the single GTR you witnessed. Clearly if one had witnessed "tons" of the same car at the track, one would intelligently expect there to be a variety of 1/4 mile times. Variables such as driver proficiency, weight, tire quality and tread, etc. all combine to give you a range of sample results.

Thus, your comment is null and misleading.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 10:15 PM
  #33  
Yellow_S's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OverBooster,Dec 11 2008, 10:54 PM
There, my friend is the flaw in your entire argument...your sample size. You witnessed "a" GTR and "tons" of Z06's. Anyone could make an erroneous conclusion (as you did) by forming an opinion off of one sample...the single GTR you witnessed. Clearly if one had witnessed "tons" of the same car at the track, one would intelligently expect there to be a variety of 1/4 mile times. Variables such as driver proficiency, weight, tire quality and tread, etc. all combine to give you a range of sample results.

Thus, your comment is null and misleading.
But with the case of the GT-R, it's more consistent than most cars due to its full and semi-full automatic transmission and AWD. However, different track and weather conditions (and drivers) still affect their times, but less so than other cars.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 06:59 AM
  #34  
nightwalker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Default

The variable with the corvettes were the drivers. Maybe the GTR had a really good driver.

Maybe the GTR is an easier car to drive.

You could take the sum of the posted time slips on NAGTROC with my observations and conclude that the GTR is an easier car to drive.

You could also search and find that the time slips posted by Corvette owners are in fact all over the place, and they've been at this game for a lot longer.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 07:10 AM
  #35  
rockville's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

I can see the GTR being consistent given how much of the job is on the computer. Car and Driver actually had a funny article where they were bracket racing an H2. They did really well because the AWD Hummer was very consistent... not fast, consistent.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 07:19 AM
  #36  
rockville's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

Originally Posted by Yellow_S,Dec 11 2008, 10:13 PM
It doesn't matter if non-owners (myself included) hate or like the GT-R, their owners seem to be very ecstatic with the car, and like or dislike doesn't change anything.
It does mater to some degree. Many NSX and S2000 owners love their cars. Honda however, made the cars rather narrow in focus and thus they appeal only to a small group. They are a great fit for that small group but they are misses for quite a number of other potential buyers.
So that means the cars sell in low volume and takes a long time to pay off it's R&D. That means the car's volume doesn't justify updates. We might get something cheap like a small displacement bump or some new interior bits but otherwise the car will be unchanged for years.
It's great when a car really really matches the wants of a market segment. However, it's not great for the future of that car if the segment is really small.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 07:19 AM
  #37  
TommyDeVito's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 490
Default

Originally Posted by kenstyle,Dec 11 2008, 06:24 PM
i gtr threads
Me too I've never seen more crying over a car. Some people act like the GTR drove itself into their house, busted the Sheetrock, and stuck its ding-a-ling into their wife
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 07:40 AM
  #38  
turbosix's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 2
From: dfw
Default

Originally Posted by nightwalker,Dec 12 2008, 09:59 AM
The variable with the corvettes were the drivers. Maybe the GTR had a really good driver.

Maybe the GTR is an easier car to drive.

You could take the sum of the posted time slips on NAGTROC with my observations and conclude that the GTR is an easier car to drive.

You could also search and find that the time slips posted by Corvette owners are in fact all over the place, and they've been at this game for a lot longer.
see yellow s' post for explanation

perfectly launching a rwd car with over 450rwhp/420rwtq on stock tires is not an easy feat. see ranger and jamie furhman(sp) for examples of people that can do it over and over again like its no big deal
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 12:06 PM
  #39  
My R2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 1
From: The Beach
Default

Originally Posted by 565565,Dec 12 2008, 12:25 AM
Looks like the trap speed is unaffected, which is the true measure of straightline power anyway.

The 0-60 and 1/4 ET's are just representative of how hard you launch it.

You should basically ignore ET's and look only at trap speeds for an idea of straight line grunt, and how fast a car truly blasts down the straights on a track.

Launching a sports car is overrated anyway. In the many years I've had the C5 Z06, I've launched my Z06 just a handful of times, got pretty bad wheel hop about half the time, and decided it was a rather stupid and boring exercise as

A) I'm not a drag racer, so I don't find racing down the quartermile exactly stimulating in any way.

B) It clearly is hard on both the drivetrain and the tires, for no real enjoyment from me.

The point is, for a true all around performance car, the performance in the first few feet from a dead stop is completely irrelevant. Those that care about it are better off getting something with a live real axle and saving themselves money and headaches.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 12:33 PM
  #40  
ITRbroham's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
From: Socal, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 565565,Dec 11 2008, 09:25 PM
Looks like the trap speed is unaffected, which is the true measure of straightline power anyway.

The 0-60 and 1/4 ET's are just representative of how hard you launch it.

You should basically ignore ET's and look only at trap speeds for an idea of straight line grunt, and how fast a car truly blasts down the straights on a track.

Launching a sports car is overrated anyway. In the many years I've had the C5 Z06, I've launched my Z06 just a handful of times, got pretty bad wheel hop about half the time, and decided it was a rather stupid and boring exercise as

A) I'm not a drag racer, so I don't find racing down the quartermile exactly stimulating in any way.

B) It clearly is hard on both the drivetrain and the tires, for no real enjoyment from me.

The point is, for a true all around performance car, the performance in the first few feet from a dead stop is completely irrelevant. Those that care about it are better off getting something with a live real axle and saving themselves money and headaches.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:18 AM.