Supra TT reliability?
Originally Posted by tenaciousFD,May 21 2007, 02:28 PM
30K will buy you a nice FD and two extra motors. 
I almost pulled the trigger on an Rx-7 earlier this year but after spending a few months on the rx-7 boards I decided I didn't want to deal with all the issues. Awesome car "when it runs". Mazda just over engineered that sucker. I would be interested in a swapped rx-7 V8 but not sure of many shops up here in the NW who do the swap or that many swapped Rx-7s for sale here.
so far I'm holding out for the supra, but it would be itneresting to see what $10k of NA mods would do to an s2k?
Originally Posted by mkiv,May 21 2007, 08:15 PM
i had my 95 tt since new and sold last year, my tt was BPU+++, i would say supra is very reliable, engine is awsome strong and never blow(no stupid drivings). other parts just like other toyotas.
Originally Posted by SilverKnight,May 21 2007, 10:16 PM
good stuff all
I almost pulled the trigger on an Rx-7 earlier this year but after spending a few months on the rx-7 boards I decided I didn't want to deal with all the issues. Awesome car "when it runs". Mazda just over engineered that sucker. I would be interested in a swapped rx-7 V8 but not sure of many shops up here in the NW who do the swap or that many swapped Rx-7s for sale here.
so far I'm holding out for the supra, but it would be itneresting to see what $10k of NA mods would do to an s2k?

I almost pulled the trigger on an Rx-7 earlier this year but after spending a few months on the rx-7 boards I decided I didn't want to deal with all the issues. Awesome car "when it runs". Mazda just over engineered that sucker. I would be interested in a swapped rx-7 V8 but not sure of many shops up here in the NW who do the swap or that many swapped Rx-7s for sale here.
so far I'm holding out for the supra, but it would be itneresting to see what $10k of NA mods would do to an s2k?

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








