Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Tax break on a new car purchase?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-29-2009, 09:17 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
xmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mocky,Nov 28 2009, 04:17 PM
^


I think people are confusing a "credit" and a "deduction". I'd love for this to be a credit, but it's not, it's a deduction.


Thanks for posting that up Gary
Yeah, that's correct. I think a lot of people are confused because originally it was going to be a tax credit, but after congress got a lot of good publicity, they quietly nerfed the bill to make it just a deduction.
Old 11-30-2009, 05:35 AM
  #22  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
nearwater4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I see. So how much aproximately would one get back?
Is the benefit significant?

Dan
Old 11-30-2009, 05:54 AM
  #23  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,697
Received 225 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xmatt,Nov 29 2009, 12:17 PM
Yeah, that's correct. I think a lot of people are confused because originally it was going to be a tax credit, but after congress got a lot of good publicity, they quietly nerfed the bill to make it just a deduction.
Yeah, that was my mistake too. They said it was going to be a tax credit. A deduction is dumb (to me) since I already get that in Texas.
Old 11-30-2009, 05:58 AM
  #24  
Former Moderator

 
Mocky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 105,817
Received 145 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nearwater4me,Nov 30 2009, 10:35 AM
I see. So how much aproximately would one get back?
Is the benefit significant?

Dan
it's definitely not the same as a credit... it depends on several factors but you can check online and can probably get a rough estimate.


I found this on the sound money matters site.. someone posted this... I think it sums it up...

-

First, per the IRS, it is not a tax credit, but a deduction. Deductions are a reduction in your taxable income. Credits are much more valuable because they are direct reductions in the tax you pay. For example, a deduction of $1 means that you save $0.35 on taxes if you are in the 35% tax bracket. A credit of $1 means you save $1 in taxes, no matter what your tax bracket.

Second, the estimated savings of $1500 on a new $25,000 car was based on the proposal, not the final law. As you noted, the original proposal included a tax deduction for car loan interest. However, it was left out of the final law. From Sen. Mikulski’s (amendment author) website (http://mikulski.senate.gov/_pdfs/Pre...xamendment.pdf), the $1500 savings was broken down into $420 savings from sales tax deduction and $1133 savings from interest deduction. Since the interest deduction was left off, the savings for the average family is only $420.

Third, because it is “above the line,” the tax saved will be significantly less than the sales tax paid. Imagine I paid $25000 for a car. Using the Senator’s assumption of 6% sales tax, I would have $1500 of sales tax that I pay at the time of the purchase to the state. This is how Sen. Mikulski can say that that this would increase state sales tax revenue. However, when I got around to filing my taxes, I would get to subtract $1500 from my income. This would reduce my federal income tax by the above $420. So, even if the federal government cuts the state benefits by the same amount as the tax cut, the state would still be up by $1000.

Sorry for the long diatribe. Your best advice is spot on. Shop for a car as if this tax savings didn’t exist, because for most of us, the savings would be less than 1 car payment.


--
Old 11-30-2009, 06:01 AM
  #25  

 
Chris S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 11,613
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've been taking sales tax deductions on car purchases for years now - no change from my perspective. (I suspect this incentive is only a benefit for citizens of states w/ income taxes)
Old 11-30-2009, 07:34 AM
  #26  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
nearwater4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mocky,Nov 30 2009, 06:58 AM
it's definitely not the same as a credit... it depends on several factors but you can check online and can probably get a rough estimate.


I found this on the sound money matters site.. someone posted this... I think it sums it up...

-

First, per the IRS, it is not a tax credit, but a deduction. Deductions are a reduction in your taxable income. Credits are much more valuable because they are direct reductions in the tax you pay. For example, a deduction of $1 means that you save $0.35 on taxes if you are in the 35% tax bracket. A credit of $1 means you save $1 in taxes, no matter what your tax bracket.

Second, the estimated savings of $1500 on a new $25,000 car was based on the proposal, not the final law. As you noted, the original proposal included a tax deduction for car loan interest. However, it was left out of the final law. From Sen. Mikulski’s (amendment author) website (http://mikulski.senate.gov/_pdfs/Pre...xamendment.pdf), the $1500 savings was broken down into $420 savings from sales tax deduction and $1133 savings from interest deduction. Since the interest deduction was left off, the savings for the average family is only $420.

Third, because it is “above the line,” the tax saved will be significantly less than the sales tax paid. Imagine I paid $25000 for a car. Using the Senator’s assumption of 6% sales tax, I would have $1500 of sales tax that I pay at the time of the purchase to the state. This is how Sen. Mikulski can say that that this would increase state sales tax revenue. However, when I got around to filing my taxes, I would get to subtract $1500 from my income. This would reduce my federal income tax by the above $420. So, even if the federal government cuts the state benefits by the same amount as the tax cut, the state would still be up by $1000.

Sorry for the long diatribe. Your best advice is spot on. Shop for a car as if this tax savings didn’t exist, because for most of us, the savings would be less than 1 car payment.


--
Thanks for clearing things up.
Had my hopes up a little too high. lol.

Dan
Old 11-30-2009, 09:14 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Ralleh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Seems like you'd take much less of a hit if you bought slightly used and avoided some of the depreciation tax.
Old 12-01-2009, 05:42 AM
  #28  

 
Scooterboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Medina, OH
Posts: 27,433
Received 2,595 Likes on 1,565 Posts
Default

Bought an '09 in April

Make to much $$ to qualify
























J/K
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GreenmanS2000
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
31
08-14-2014 08:16 AM
stockae92
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
5
11-25-2009 02:21 PM
stockae92
Car and Bike Talk
38
05-11-2009 10:51 PM
S2LEGEND
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
9
02-11-2009 10:04 AM
WarrenW
Car and Bike Talk
19
02-04-2009 04:29 PM



Quick Reply: Tax break on a new car purchase?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 AM.