Z06 Rotor issues.
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island/C'ville, VA
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think I'd let this stop me from getting one. Didn't Porsche have a problem (not really a problem, but complaints about) with the brakes on their 911 Turbos a few years ago?
#12
Originally Posted by happs22,Jan 15 2006, 07:53 PM
I don't think I'd let this stop me from getting one. Didn't Porsche have a problem (not really a problem, but complaints about) with the brakes on their 911 Turbos a few years ago?
#13
I didn't notice it until it was pointed out to me over at the Corvette forum. Braking performance is not affected, at least not that I've noticed. I've been to 1 roadracing event since getting the car last October, and have done several aggressive canyon runs. The holes are just cosmetic anyways, drilled holes are never good for performance, slots are the way to go. Cast holes are OK though. IMO the real reasons the Z06 brakes stop so well are: large rotors, large calipers, multiple padlets. Those holes don't do much really. I'm hoping that the aftermarket will come through with their padlets soon, because as of this time, only GM has those padlet replacements and they're expensive and not widely available. More choices of pads would be appreciated as well.
#15
Registered User
I'm still not seeing this as more than a theoretical problem. Or something for people to complain about. Tho I do think GM should be smart enough to figure out that directional things have to be changed for R or L fitment. (hence the far side cartoon)
However the Z06 has put up very good Ring times, better than any car that's made in such numbers. And I read GM claims it's been tested to run in a 24 hr race with no modification needed. (well I guess except roll cage).
However the Z06 has put up very good Ring times, better than any car that's made in such numbers. And I read GM claims it's been tested to run in a 24 hr race with no modification needed. (well I guess except roll cage).
#16
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N. Tx.
Posts: 4,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brent_strong,Jan 15 2006, 12:09 PM
It's no fun to crucify Honda for every mistake they make, though. Let's just blindly hate on American manufacturers.
I don't think I am blindly hating on American manufacturers. I just think it was a silly goof up. Something I was hoping would be corrected ASAP. As of now, there are no plans for the correction. These are minor issues but still a bit concerning.
btw, just to clarify. I am still debating ordering a Z06. Just haven't decided to add the Z06 or trade in the NSX or just get a track car.
#18
Didn't Porsche have a problem (not really a problem, but complaints about) with the brakes on their 911 Turbos a few years ago?
Mentioned above their early batch PCCB's were giving up the ghost quicker than they should have.
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Little Rock, AR/ Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This was not an "oversight" by GM. Clearly they felt the difference was not worth the cost of creating a new mold as this "feature" is present on EVERY SINGLE C6 IN PRODUCTION. It is NOT limited to the Z06.
#20
Registered User
Originally Posted by steve c,Jan 15 2006, 01:05 PM
So does TSB54 (for 3 years in a row without a fix) mean that S2000's are not immune to "honda quality" after all?
Service Bulletin 200100-054
BACKGROUND
Clearance between transmission gears (backlash) is normal and sometimes audible. In an S2000, this noise is more noticeable since the transmission is between the seats instead of up front in the engine compartment. When the vehicle decelerates, its weight, together with the pulses from the engine, excites the transmission gears, causing them to buzz or rattle.
what's the description of the issue on the recall notice associated with the C6 rotors?