f20cpower3

Between a 1994 toyota supra twin turbo stock, vs. a 2003 BWM M3 stock, which would pull from a dig...how about a roll on from 30?

Slamnasty

I'm guessing it would be somewhat even, with the M3 edging out by a nose at the checkered flag. Both are of similar weight, but I think the Supra is heavier car generally, on top of having 18 fewer hp. The BMW is revvier and would probably require more work, but I can't see it losing assuming drivers with relatively equal capability.

bunz559

i think an m3. i have yet to see a stock supra, completely stock, pull on many cars besides your average civics and integras.

sahtt

It would be a driver's race. Supra's aren't slow stock, they dyno roughly 320 crank hp vs 333 of the m3, but more torque and have a friendlier to launch LSD unit.

pierceman

who has a stock supra these days ??????

slates74

someone sitting on a gold mine lol

kumainu

Both can run very low 13s (even high 12s) at anywhere from 106-109mph. But when it comes to modification, the Supra is leagues above the M3, due to its "bullet-proof" engine.

MoogieBoogie

Back in college, my roommate had a 03 m3 and I had a 97 supra turbo. Both were stock, both were manual transmissions. One time for fun, we raced for a 25 mph roll on an empty highway (cornfields). Both of us would start out even, somewhere between 3rd and 4th gear, the Supra would pull away slowly. It wasn't a complete blowout or anything - probably would come down to the driver.

We both still have our cars, but rarely drive them. It was fun while it lasted.

-Brian.

dwnshft & xlr8

Seat my a** in the Supra, and I'll guarantee that M3 won't edge me out!!!!

kumainu

One thing very bad about the Supra, one has to be very careful around it. Even wind from a fart could boost its power up by a thousand times. The best 3L I6 ever made and ever will be!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! One can literally take a machine gun and shoot at the engine and it would shrug it off, because it's "bullet-proof".