2.5 WRX
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 29,526
Likes: 4
From: ...by a lake...somewhere
Originally Posted by dreamer,Aug 14 2006, 09:41 AM
The car has to make me grin - I couldn't hack driving an "ordinary" car or a beater on a daily basis.
I have just the thing for you
forget that, just remembered its 5 years old.
Former Moderator
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45,694
Likes: 1
From: Oxfordshire
Originally Posted by dreamer,Aug 14 2006, 10:41 AM
Scooby might tick some boxes, but it also needs to be comparable or better on fuel than the S: the company pays a measly 11.5p/mile (below 2.0L) or 13.5p (above 2L) and no I can't claim the rest from the IR due to our poxy co. car scheme, so even with the S I'm running at a personal loss permile.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 16,369
Likes: 4
From: Tyne Valley
Originally Posted by dreamer,Aug 14 2006, 10:41 AM
but it also needs to be comparable or better on fuel than the S:
S2000 has excellent fuel economy for it's performance. Looks like it's a diesel for you
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
WRX = basic car
WRX SL = sunroof/leather/heated seats.
STi = UK specced car come to the gills, to try to justify the inflated price.
My mortgage guy recommends
http://www.allbrandsnew.co.uk/
up in Hull.
WRX SL = sunroof/leather/heated seats.
STi = UK specced car come to the gills, to try to justify the inflated price.
My mortgage guy recommends
http://www.allbrandsnew.co.uk/
up in Hull.
