Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Any triumph spitfire experience?

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 31, 2014 | 09:23 AM
  #31  
PTR300's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire UK
Default

Originally Posted by cheshire_carper
Originally Posted by Daytona-Dave' timestamp='1409436334' post='23309011
Here's one for You Colin, couple of weeks should put it right

If you think you have the time for it. Let's do it
Go for it ! plenty of patina to go around ! although plenty of beer would probably help.....
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2014 | 09:31 AM
  #32  
lower's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,652
Likes: 17
From: Market Harborough, Leics.
Default

Originally Posted by GreenmanS2000
The sprint 16v engine, more specifically the had, was fundamentally flawed in that the head bolts were vertical so it could never be torqued properly. Hence all the head gasket issues.
That was its reputation, but it's main problem was the mix of materials in the engine. Specifically the block was iron and the head was aluminium which meant it was critical that the coolant was the correct mix. If it wasn't the cooling system would clog up with corrosion by products and the engine would overheat and blow its head gasket.

I had a Herald 13/60 convertible as my first car that I completely rebuilt after the chassis rusted through. The only bit I didn't rebuild was the diff. You can strip most of the car just with a 1/2" spanner and lots of plus gas and all of the engines, drivetrain and running gear is common between the spitfire, gt6, herald and vitesse.

The mk3 is my favourite Spit. It has the best mix of the older looks but with the 1296cc engine. The mk4's handling with the swing spring was better but I just don't like the look of the car as much. I'd agree with Gad in avoiding the 1500. It's just a stroked 1296 and is not an engine suited to a sports car.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 04:44 AM
  #33  
GreenmanS2000's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
Default

The 1500 Spitfire has the added disadvantage of "wax" jets in the carb which tend to get sticky when hot....It's an asthmatic lump - c75bhp if I recall, although c85 is possible with head work, a free flowing (Triumph Tune) exhaust and some decent carbs.

The overdrive is good fun - you can tell people you have a 7 speed gearbox (8 if you fiddle with it to allow O/S in first)
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 09:05 AM
  #34  
cheshire_carper's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 29,526
Likes: 4
From: ...by a lake...somewhere
Default

I may well end up with a 1500 as there's lots of them and should the plan fail, I'll just scrap it.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2014 | 10:14 AM
  #35  
PTR300's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire UK
Default

Originally Posted by cheshire_carper
I may well end up with a 1500 as there's lots of them and should the plan fail, I'll just scrap it.
Noooooh !! go for the 1300, earlier car, much better bet


Here you go , mark 3 1300 resto.

http://www.tssc.org.uk/tssc/classifi...ssified_ID=332



Model name Engine Year Number built
Triumph Spitfire 4 (Mark 1) 1147 cc inline 4 Oct 1962 – Dec 1964 45,753[1]
Triumph Spitfire 4 Mark 2 1147 cc inline 4 Dec 1964 – Jan 1967 37,409[1]
Triumph Spitfire Mark 3 1296 cc inline 4 Jan 1967– Dec 1970 65,320[1]
Triumph Spitfire Mark IV 1296 cc inline 4 Nov 1970 – Dec 1974 70,021[1]
Triumph Spitfire 1500 1493 cc inline 4 Dec 1974 – Aug 1980 95,829[1]
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pinky
Carolinas
14
Nov 2, 2012 07:20 PM
j8mie
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
17
Jan 31, 2011 02:27 AM
SPLNDID
Arizona S2000 Owners
15
Mar 16, 2007 09:22 AM
Napoleon Dynamite
Alabama S2000 Owners Club
13
May 30, 2005 02:59 PM
bigsley18
Mid-Atlantic S2000 Owners
13
Jan 23, 2005 08:08 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:18 PM.