Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Anyone running a 335i

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-20-2010, 04:13 AM
  #51  
Registered User

 
MUG3N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m1bjr,Mar 20 2010, 01:54 AM
I think the point was missed by a mile here
Point has been missed? Knowing you it will end up with a big spoiler on the back and you will still take it on a track day or two

Don't forget it wasn't that long ago you were talking about getting an FD2

Have to say I am still surprised you didnt opt for an M-Sport version over the SE?
Old 03-20-2010, 02:18 PM
  #52  

Thread Starter
 
m1bjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 11,446
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sti Vi,Mar 20 2010, 01:13 PM
Point has been missed? Knowing you it will end up with a big spoiler on the back and you will still take it on a track day or two

Don't forget it wasn't that long ago you were talking about getting an FD2

Have to say I am still surprised you didnt opt for an M-Sport version over the SE?
I cant afford the M sport variant.

I have to eat beans on toast every day as it is.
Old 03-20-2010, 02:27 PM
  #53  
Registered User

 
MUG3N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m1bjr,Mar 20 2010, 10:18 PM
I cant afford the M sport variant.
Going from two extreme cars to an SE BMW variant, I have my doubts on how long before you get bored with it. I do miss my S alot, the BMW is great on long journeys but thats about it
Old 03-21-2010, 12:46 AM
  #54  
Registered User

 
Welshman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: La Massana, Principat D'Andorra
Posts: 3,796
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by m1bjr,Mar 17 2010, 05:59 PM
The end result is the same 300 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque as before, but with a fatter torque curve that maintains its peak from 1,200-5,000 rpm.
I think you will find the claimed power is understated. Claimed power on my version is 306 bhp. It was dynoed at Powerstation in Tewkesbury at 325bhp without any modifications. I had the BMW Performance Pack fitted which is a revised map for the ECU plus an extra cooling radiator. It then was dynoed at 335 bhp.

The torque was measured at 349 lb.ft at 2,950 rpm up from 318 lb.ft at 3,285 rpm.

Chap at Powerstation said BMW were known to be conservative about claimed power outputs,
Old 03-21-2010, 04:36 AM
  #55  
Banned
 
gaddafi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Survivalist enclave
Posts: 31,790
Received 69 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Welshman,Mar 21 2010, 08:46 AM
I think you will find the claimed power is understated. Claimed power on my version is 306 bhp. It was dynoed at Powerstation in Tewkesbury at 325bhp without any modifications. I had the BMW Performance Pack fitted which is a revised map for the ECU plus an extra cooling radiator. It then was dynoed at 335 bhp.

The torque was measured at 349 lb.ft at 2,950 rpm up from 318 lb.ft at 3,285 rpm.

Chap at Powerstation said BMW were known to be conservative about claimed power outputs,
that might explain why a modified 335 isn't as fast as my unmodified 102,000 mile M5

Old 03-21-2010, 04:55 AM
  #56  
Registered User
 
chilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sideways with an OWL!
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by m1bjr,Mar 20 2010, 11:18 PM
I cant afford the M sport variant.

I have to eat beans on toast every day as it is.
M sport variants are rubbish IMHO. They're too stiffly sprung so the ride is rubbish. The SE gives a better ride without compromising the ride too much.
Old 03-21-2010, 05:35 AM
  #57  
ge2
Registered User

 
ge2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leigh-On-Sea
Posts: 5,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 535d M Sport I rode in seemed fine to me, better than my Legacy anyway.

It could've been a smooth road.

Are the 5s & 3s the same?

Longer wheelbase on the 5?
Old 03-21-2010, 06:10 PM
  #58  

Thread Starter
 
m1bjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 11,446
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chilled,Mar 21 2010, 01:55 PM
M sport variants are rubbish IMHO. They're too stiffly sprung so the ride is rubbish. The SE gives a better ride without compromising the ride too much.


Tried a few cars lately myself too.

The 135i M Sport ride was crap, but being used to the Reno and the S2k we could live with it.

The SE 335i is in another league, seems to corner fairly well on the oem RFs but very smooth ride.

Ultimately this is a family car, not a track toy - I will be hiring 'proper' cars for that in future as it's more cost effective on a share basis.
So the need for extreme cornering is negated.
traffic light Gp still on the cards though
Welshman, noted re the figures and I have seen that mentioned before.

I like these bimmer things, so just ordered an new 3 series for a runabout for work
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JSWhaler
New England S2000 Owners
3
04-15-2010 05:57 AM
JamieS2K
Car Talk - Non S2000
10
03-23-2010 11:59 PM
sean_f
Car Talk - Non S2000
4
04-14-2009 04:45 AM
HvRRZ
The S2000 Gallery
56
01-24-2007 04:09 PM
AquilaEagle
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
28
09-27-2004 12:58 AM



Quick Reply: Anyone running a 335i



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:58 AM.