Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Bike vs Car - Anglesey

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-11-2012, 11:40 AM
  #21  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Frustration
Posts: 12,333
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blue monster
Wasn't there a more recent car vs. bike on the last series of 5th Gear with the new KTM X-Bow vs. a KTM race bike in Germany?

The bike won even though the new X-Bow has some thing like 300 bhp
Yeah, the Xbow is over 800kg though and the Red Bull ring will favour a bike.

Old 12-11-2012, 11:45 AM
  #22  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Frustration
Posts: 12,333
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BuggyofMildDiscomfort
Originally Posted by lovegroova' timestamp='1355226282' post='22202860
Silverstone lap times
Best lap
F1: Alonso 1:30.874 (2010)
MotoGP: Stoner 2:02.020 (2011)

Donington
F1: Senna 1:18.029 (1993)
MotoGP: 1:28.116 (2009)

4 wheels better than 2 (assuming I've not got that wrong)

No, downforce is better than mechanical grip alone.....
No, they are a product of each other
Old 12-11-2012, 11:53 AM
  #23  

 
Nottm_S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 22,608
Received 637 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

The 5th gear thing is on youtube. Its rubbish so as per form for them.
Old 12-11-2012, 11:02 PM
  #24  

 
unclefester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,336
Received 179 Likes on 145 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ultra_Nexus
Originally Posted by BuggyofMildDiscomfort' timestamp='1355250149' post='22203647
[quote name='lovegroova' timestamp='1355226282' post='22202860']
Silverstone lap times
Best lap
F1: Alonso 1:30.874 (2010)
MotoGP: Stoner 2:02.020 (2011)

Donington
F1: Senna 1:18.029 (1993)
MotoGP: 1:28.116 (2009)

4 wheels better than 2 (assuming I've not got that wrong)

No, downforce is better than mechanical grip alone.....
No, they are a product of each other
[/quote]

Are we including gravity in downforce now then? Surely gravity gives you a degree of basic mechanical grip which downforce can be added to.
Old 12-12-2012, 01:28 AM
  #25  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Frustration
Posts: 12,333
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unclefester
Are we including gravity in downforce now then? Surely gravity gives you a degree of basic mechanical grip which downforce can be added to.
Gravity isn't downforce. Gravity applies to the mass of the car - the higher the mass, the more the gravity acts on it. Problem being is that the more grip you need to pull the mass around the corner.

Downforce is a force that only acts straight down. Really it is negative lift and it allows a car weighing 500kg to have the mechanical grip of a car weighing more but without the penalty of mass.

Moving beyond that, there is a way the tyre will work with a certain loading and the continued increased loading will not give you a linear benefit. Basically, a car weighing 1000kg will not have twice the grip as a car weighing 500kg.
Old 12-12-2012, 02:31 AM
  #26  

 
eSeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: City Of London / Knebworth
Posts: 39,551
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ultra_Nexus
the higher the mass, the more the gravity acts on it.
That could be explained a little better ..... the greater the mass the greater the mechanical grip as a result of gravity.

Old 12-12-2012, 02:31 AM
  #27  

 
unclefester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,336
Received 179 Likes on 145 Posts
Default

The point being you can't have mechanical grip and downforce as a by product of each other without taking gravity ( weight / mass) into account on its own before you introduce downforce to add more grip without adding more mass / weight.

Edit: What ESEM said
Old 12-12-2012, 02:44 AM
  #28  

 
SCZ4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Depends on the circuit (I don't know Anglesey). Westfields are great on tight\slow circuits but anything with a decent straight they lose out to even modestly fast cars, so a bike will make up a LOT of ground which will be hard to claw back under braking and cornering.

I'm saying this as an ex Westfield owner (180bhp Zetec), even with an aersoscreen the car seemed to hit a brick wall at around 90mph, awesome round the tight stuff though and very agile.
Old 12-12-2012, 02:57 AM
  #29  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Frustration
Posts: 12,333
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SCZ4
Depends on the circuit (I don't know Anglesey). Westfields are great on tight\slow circuits but anything with a decent straight they lose out to even modestly fast cars, so a bike will make up a LOT of ground which will be hard to claw back under braking and cornering.

I'm saying this as an ex Westfield owner (180bhp Zetec), even with an aersoscreen the car seemed to hit a brick wall at around 90mph, awesome round the tight stuff though and very agile.
Well, the only time an M3 CSL came past me was when I hit the limiter in 5th at 142 leptons.

Otherwise, I left him like an S2000 would leave a 1.6 Focus.
Old 12-12-2012, 04:17 AM
  #30  

 
SCZ4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Fair enough, perhaps the extra power makes all the difference... * I'm not saying it didn't accelerate after 90mph, but it really tailed off. Felt slower than say the S2000 does, aerodynamics of a brick really.

To put it into prospective, I remember running a 13.2 1/4 mile, top speed was 101mph. A friends Cossie did a 13.6 1/4 miles, but a top speed of 112mph.


Quick Reply: Bike vs Car - Anglesey



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:58 AM.