Bike vs Car - Anglesey
#21
Registered User
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/S2Ki/milestonestars-10yr.png)
Thread Starter
![Default](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b2/Circuit_Red_Bull_Ring.svg/512px-Circuit_Red_Bull_Ring.svg.png)
#22
Registered User
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/S2Ki/milestonestars-10yr.png)
Thread Starter
![Default](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by lovegroova' timestamp='1355226282' post='22202860
Silverstone lap times
Best lap
F1: Alonso 1:30.874 (2010)
MotoGP: Stoner 2:02.020 (2011)
Donington
F1: Senna 1:18.029 (1993)
MotoGP: 1:28.116 (2009)
4 wheels better than 2 (assuming I've not got that wrong)
Best lap
F1: Alonso 1:30.874 (2010)
MotoGP: Stoner 2:02.020 (2011)
Donington
F1: Senna 1:18.029 (1993)
MotoGP: 1:28.116 (2009)
4 wheels better than 2 (assuming I've not got that wrong)
No, downforce is better than mechanical grip alone.....
![smile.gif](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#23
![Default](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 5th gear thing is on youtube. Its rubbish so as per form for them.
#24
![Default](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by BuggyofMildDiscomfort' timestamp='1355250149' post='22203647
[quote name='lovegroova' timestamp='1355226282' post='22202860']
Silverstone lap times
Best lap
F1: Alonso 1:30.874 (2010)
MotoGP: Stoner 2:02.020 (2011)
Donington
F1: Senna 1:18.029 (1993)
MotoGP: 1:28.116 (2009)
4 wheels better than 2 (assuming I've not got that wrong)
Silverstone lap times
Best lap
F1: Alonso 1:30.874 (2010)
MotoGP: Stoner 2:02.020 (2011)
Donington
F1: Senna 1:18.029 (1993)
MotoGP: 1:28.116 (2009)
4 wheels better than 2 (assuming I've not got that wrong)
No, downforce is better than mechanical grip alone.....
![smile.gif](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
[/quote]
Are we including gravity in downforce now then? Surely gravity gives you a degree of basic mechanical grip which downforce can be added to.
#25
Registered User
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/S2Ki/milestonestars-10yr.png)
Thread Starter
![Default](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Downforce is a force that only acts straight down. Really it is negative lift and it allows a car weighing 500kg to have the mechanical grip of a car weighing more but without the penalty of mass.
Moving beyond that, there is a way the tyre will work with a certain loading and the continued increased loading will not give you a linear benefit. Basically, a car weighing 1000kg will not have twice the grip as a car weighing 500kg.
#27
![Default](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The point being you can't have mechanical grip and downforce as a by product of each other without taking gravity ( weight / mass) into account on its own before you introduce downforce to add more grip without adding more mass / weight.
Edit: What ESEM said
Edit: What ESEM said
![smile.gif](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#28
![Default](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Depends on the circuit (I don't know Anglesey). Westfields are great on tight\slow circuits but anything with a decent straight they lose out to even modestly fast cars, so a bike will make up a LOT of ground which will be hard to claw back under braking and cornering.
I'm saying this as an ex Westfield owner (180bhp Zetec), even with an aersoscreen the car seemed to hit a brick wall at around 90mph, awesome round the tight stuff though and very agile.
I'm saying this as an ex Westfield owner (180bhp Zetec), even with an aersoscreen the car seemed to hit a brick wall at around 90mph, awesome round the tight stuff though and very agile.
#29
Registered User
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/S2Ki/milestonestars-10yr.png)
Thread Starter
![Default](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Depends on the circuit (I don't know Anglesey). Westfields are great on tight\slow circuits but anything with a decent straight they lose out to even modestly fast cars, so a bike will make up a LOT of ground which will be hard to claw back under braking and cornering.
I'm saying this as an ex Westfield owner (180bhp Zetec), even with an aersoscreen the car seemed to hit a brick wall at around 90mph, awesome round the tight stuff though and very agile.
I'm saying this as an ex Westfield owner (180bhp Zetec), even with an aersoscreen the car seemed to hit a brick wall at around 90mph, awesome round the tight stuff though and very agile.
Otherwise, I left him like an S2000 would leave a 1.6 Focus.
#30
![Default](https://www.s2ki.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Fair enough, perhaps the extra power makes all the difference... * I'm not saying it didn't accelerate after 90mph, but it really tailed off. Felt slower than say the S2000 does, aerodynamics of a brick really.
To put it into prospective, I remember running a 13.2 1/4 mile, top speed was 101mph. A friends Cossie did a 13.6 1/4 miles, but a top speed of 112mph.
To put it into prospective, I remember running a 13.2 1/4 mile, top speed was 101mph. A friends Cossie did a 13.6 1/4 miles, but a top speed of 112mph.