Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Diseasel drivers

Thread Tools
 
Old May 29, 2014 | 10:36 AM
  #21  
PhilipGB's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova
I wonder how come it is your flatmate can't find a seat on PT if it's so expensive and inconvenient?
People travelling from further away filling the train where the journey begins to make sense from a time point of view.

People who can't drive.

People who can't afford to run a car.

People who are only a 1 car family and the other half is using it for the half mile school run with their fat children
Reply
Old May 29, 2014 | 10:59 AM
  #22  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipGB
People who can't afford to run a car.
That makes no sense if going by train is more expensive than driving.
Reply
Old May 29, 2014 | 11:12 AM
  #23  
S2KMick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default

European manufacturers (especially the German one's) have done a wonderful job of convincing folks that diesel is "cleaner". I guess in Europe its also cheaper is it not? So, how can a consumer not be taken in by all the convincing as well as the ease on the pocket book? Truth be known, diesel is the worst of all the "fossil gasolines" in terms of its harmful results. You may not "see" it for the first year, but every diesel engine spews an incredible amount of carbon particles into the air, which either lands on the earth or gets carried in the wind. Last time I looked Carbon was the most devastating carcinogen known to humans - breath enough years of it and you might as well smoke and get cancer that way!! This is like taking all the carbon out of those dinosaurs and putting them back to the surface of the earth!!!
And now they are trying to convince us that "clean" diesel has solved all of those problems!!!
Reply
Old May 29, 2014 | 12:49 PM
  #24  
PhilipGB's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova
Originally Posted by PhilipGB' timestamp='1401388616' post='23181049

People who can't afford to run a car.
That makes no sense if going by train is more expensive than driving.
I only ever said fuel was cheaper.

Obviously buying, insuring, taxing and maintaining a car costs more than public transport. But if you've covered those initial outlays then only fuel (and wear and tear I guess) is a factor
Reply
Old May 29, 2014 | 10:39 PM
  #25  
unclefester's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,330
Likes: 180
Default

I'm still amused by the train service that runs from Bedford to Bletchley - every time i see it cross the barriers at 6.47am .... it has about 4 people on the entire thing including the driver, how is this even viable.
Reply
Old May 29, 2014 | 11:06 PM
  #26  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipGB
I only ever said fuel was cheaper.

Obviously buying, insuring, taxing and maintaining a car costs more than public transport. But if you've covered those initial outlays then only fuel (and wear and tear I guess) is a factor


Originally Posted by PhilipGB
And car is cheaper than train for other journeys even with no passengers.
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 12:14 AM
  #27  
PTR300's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire UK
Default

Originally Posted by unclefester
I can remember a time not that long ago when it was considered the norm to walk 2 miles to school and 2 miles back. It wasn't a safety issue as there was about 1500 of us doing it. The only congestion was at the school crossing over the main road when the few cars that were there had to wait for us to cross.
With you on this one,plus when I was going to school if you missed the bus,you walked,if you got tired of walking tough because no yummy mummy was going to collect you in her 4be and deliver you to the school gates.....

The alternative was a bike, if it was raining you got wet,tough, once again no pavement off roader to transport you in those days !

Biggest congestion for me was crossing the railway, hundreds of walking,cycling kids waiting for the gates to open after the train had gone !

Result was none, or little, (buses) diesel pollution , kids that were whippet like and fit, not built like brick shi houses that couldn't breathe properly let alone walk 200 yards never mind two miles.
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 12:18 AM
  #28  
PTR300's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire UK
Default

Originally Posted by gaddafi
Why would anyone take a politician seriously on this subject? The incentives to get people into diesel and the denial about the facts surrounding that fuel being just one example of why they simply cannot be trusted.

As for putting the spotlight/responsibility on the small private user - bloody typical.
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 12:22 AM
  #29  
PTR300's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire UK
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves
Originally Posted by gaddafi' timestamp='1401350500' post='23180182
Why would anyone take a politician seriously on this subject? The incentives to get people into diesel and the denial about the facts surrounding that fuel being just one example of why they simply cannot be trusted.

As for putting the spotlight/responsibility on the small private user - bloody typical.
They can probably be trusted, if you take a contrarian attitude to everything they say.

If one tells you to get off the line because there's a train coming, it's probably safe to cross. Because it's not built yet and has already cost twice as much as was envisaged...
Trouble is they used to have the lines built until some dipsh*t government department pulled them all up in the sixties. I know a LOTS of people who would be able to use the commuter lines around where I live to get to work... except they are gone now with just track beds left.

Now they all use diesels vehicles to commute 15 miles or so to the city
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 04:22 AM
  #30  
PhilipGB's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova

Originally Posted by PhilipGB' timestamp='1401301410' post='23179272
And car is cheaper than train for other journeys even with no passengers.
Well in contract law maybe you'd have me, but you also clearly read the post where I said:

And I don't know what rail network you use but I can't think of any train journey I take that isn't cheaper by car just counting fuel. I already have the insurance and tax in place regardless of how I take an individual journey. If I can get a passenger to split the fuel bill a car is monumentally cheaper.
So congrats for trawling through the posts to find the technicality I slipped up on

I'd honestly rather you have won the argument calling me on a grammatical error
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:29 PM.