Diseasel drivers
People who can't drive.
People who can't afford to run a car.
People who are only a 1 car family and the other half is using it for the half mile school run with their fat children
European manufacturers (especially the German one's) have done a wonderful job of convincing folks that diesel is "cleaner". I guess in Europe its also cheaper is it not? So, how can a consumer not be taken in by all the convincing as well as the ease on the pocket book? Truth be known, diesel is the worst of all the "fossil gasolines" in terms of its harmful results. You may not "see" it for the first year, but every diesel engine spews an incredible amount of carbon particles into the air, which either lands on the earth or gets carried in the wind. Last time I looked Carbon was the most devastating carcinogen known to humans - breath enough years of it and you might as well smoke and get cancer that way!! This is like taking all the carbon out of those dinosaurs and putting them back to the surface of the earth!!!
And now they are trying to convince us that "clean" diesel has solved all of those problems!!!
And now they are trying to convince us that "clean" diesel has solved all of those problems!!!
Obviously buying, insuring, taxing and maintaining a car costs more than public transport. But if you've covered those initial outlays then only fuel (and wear and tear I guess) is a factor
I'm still amused by the train service that runs from Bedford to Bletchley - every time i see it cross the barriers at 6.47am .... it has about 4 people on the entire thing including the driver, how is this even viable.
I can remember a time not that long ago when it was considered the norm to walk 2 miles to school and 2 miles back. It wasn't a safety issue as there was about 1500 of us doing it. The only congestion was at the school crossing over the main road when the few cars that were there had to wait for us to cross.
The alternative was a bike, if it was raining you got wet,tough, once again no pavement off roader to transport you in those days !
Biggest congestion for me was crossing the railway, hundreds of walking,cycling kids waiting for the gates to open after the train had gone !
Result was none, or little, (buses) diesel pollution , kids that were whippet like and fit, not built like brick shi
houses that couldn't breathe properly let alone walk 200 yards never mind two miles.
Why would anyone take a politician seriously on this subject? The incentives to get people into diesel and the denial about the facts surrounding that fuel being just one example of why they simply cannot be trusted.
As for putting the spotlight/responsibility on the small private user - bloody typical.
As for putting the spotlight/responsibility on the small private user - bloody typical.
Originally Posted by gaddafi' timestamp='1401350500' post='23180182
Why would anyone take a politician seriously on this subject? The incentives to get people into diesel and the denial about the facts surrounding that fuel being just one example of why they simply cannot be trusted.
As for putting the spotlight/responsibility on the small private user - bloody typical.
As for putting the spotlight/responsibility on the small private user - bloody typical.
If one tells you to get off the line because there's a train coming, it's probably safe to cross. Because it's not built yet and has already cost twice as much as was envisaged...
Now they all use diesels vehicles to commute 15 miles or so to the city
And I don't know what rail network you use but I can't think of any train journey I take that isn't cheaper by car just counting fuel. I already have the insurance and tax in place regardless of how I take an individual journey. If I can get a passenger to split the fuel bill a car is monumentally cheaper.

I'd honestly rather you have won the argument calling me on a grammatical error







