If this were on Ebay
I think you'll find there have been electric superchargers for sale on Ebay for some time!
I saw the article you've posted while ago and the concept really appeals.
With some interesting programing of the ECU; controlling ignition, injection, valve timing and 'electric' boost - the properties of the an engine could be very interesting.
Full boost available from tick-over would make for an interesting driving experience...
I saw the article you've posted while ago and the concept really appeals.
With some interesting programing of the ECU; controlling ignition, injection, valve timing and 'electric' boost - the properties of the an engine could be very interesting.
Full boost available from tick-over would make for an interesting driving experience...
Wasn't quite that bad not I've found the thread .. it was a loss of 3bhp.
http://www.imoc.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php...der=asc&start=0
Some good info on this link too :
http://autospeed.drive.com.au/cms/A_0237/a...?popularArticle
I wonder how they have actually got this to "work".
http://www.imoc.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php...der=asc&start=0
Some good info on this link too :
http://autospeed.drive.com.au/cms/A_0237/a...?popularArticle
I wonder how they have actually got this to "work".
So, how much power does it take to drive an efficient supercharger like a screw type? The most efficient type of supercharger, flowing 265 cfm and developing a boost of 11.5 psi, takes 14.5kW to drive it. Figures aren't readily available for centrifugal blowers, but they'd be of a similar magnitude. So the best blower design (the same type that's used on the Mazda 800) takes about 14,500 watts to drive it on a modest-sized engine. This power is derived from the engine via a belt connecting the blower to the engine's crankshaft.
But let's say that instead of using a belt-drive from the engine, we power the supercharger by using a 12 volt electric motor powered from the car battery. For an electric motor power of 14,500 watts, we'd need a current flow of about 1000 amps (14,500 watts divided by 13.8 volts = 1050 amps). So, to supply the current to drive an electric supercharger having the same airflow output as the most energy-efficient type currently available, it would take 1000 amps. To generate this much electrical power would require at least 8 heavy-duty alternators bolted to the engine. Furthermore, to handle this current, the wires connecting the battery to the supercharger would have to be enormously thick - perhaps brass or copper bars 10mm square would be needed.
But let's say that instead of using a belt-drive from the engine, we power the supercharger by using a 12 volt electric motor powered from the car battery. For an electric motor power of 14,500 watts, we'd need a current flow of about 1000 amps (14,500 watts divided by 13.8 volts = 1050 amps). So, to supply the current to drive an electric supercharger having the same airflow output as the most energy-efficient type currently available, it would take 1000 amps. To generate this much electrical power would require at least 8 heavy-duty alternators bolted to the engine. Furthermore, to handle this current, the wires connecting the battery to the supercharger would have to be enormously thick - perhaps brass or copper bars 10mm square would be needed.
Trending Topics
would be similar to 'low-blow' turbos. mearly help with emissions rather than anything else.
can understand the thinking behind it, but would be little use for anything other than tackling emissions.
can understand the thinking behind it, but would be little use for anything other than tackling emissions.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
grantedS2k
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
1
Jun 16, 2016 03:36 PM
Defender
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
4
Jun 13, 2005 04:40 PM





