Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

M3 Cab

Thread Tools
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 12:49 AM
  #41  
MarkB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,979
Likes: 0
From: North Yorks
Default

[QUOTE=gaddafi,May 12 2008, 07:55 PM] You can get things to match it or beat it performance wise - if you tweak them, but they will hardly be what most describe as a motor with some class.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 12:53 AM
  #42  
chilled's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 1
From: sideways with an OWL!
Default

The M cars are supposedly different to the Audi S/RS cars. The RS6 was completely uninvolving, and it was indeed designed for you to travel quickly. Same with the RS4 (old one). YOu could be doing 140 and not notice. Same with AMG I'd guess. I'm having my test drive in the M3 on saturday so I'll reserve my judgement on the M cars until then. But my biggest concern is the weight of the thing. But it's only 300kg heavier than the S, with 100bhp more. So it could go either way.

The lotus garage has a mint S1 elise which is cheap. I'm considering running that for a bit if I don't like the M3.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 01:06 AM
  #43  
ADP's Avatar
ADP
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Default

The M3 certainly feels heavier than an S, however it feels much much more solid and imho still feels very agile. Handling wise its chalk and cheese, the S2000 never made me feel like I wanted to press on more, the M3 does - roundabouts make you want to push more and more, great fun.

I had my heart set on a noggy blue RS4 avant and found "the perfect one" however I was utterly dissapointed when we went for a drive - I was set to buy it until we took off down the road. I could only describe it as neutral and un involving - like I said I was gutted it was like this - I really wanted it! The thing that helped kill it was my mate gave me a lift in his M3 to see it. He opened it up onto the motorway and the noise it made just made me want one! Then I found you could fold the seats down to make a huge load space and I was sold(I needed to be able to get a couple of bikes in which I can easily.)
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 01:22 AM
  #44  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Originally Posted by MarkB,May 13 2008, 08:49 AM
I can't get past the feeling that all these cars are for people who want to travel quickly, rather than drive quickly IYSWIM.

Technological tour des forces for sure, but not for me. They have a place, but a big car has to overcome big weights shifting around, and the level of chassis engineering required to make that possible seems beyond most manufacturers so they rely on insulating the driver and using electronics to keep the thing stable. The RS6 I drove was mind-bendingly quick for a 4 seater estate, but closer a experience to travelling by train than driving a Seven for example.

The M5 may well be the exception, but until you let me loose somewhere other than the road I'll have to reserve judgement
You're on the money, there!

Disconnect the FREDs on an Audi to see what an evil pig of a car they truly are.

The older M5s are hilarious on a track day; Starsky & Hutch spring to mind. Talk about deluded owners completely missing the point. Although to be fair, it does look quite fun; 50/50 mass distribution etc, etc. So I would too, probably.

Any saloon car tends to be a bit of a barge. But that's why Lotuses and S2000s and stuff can be very tiresome on a long journey.

What sort of concerns me IS the tendency for cars generally to be moving in that direction; I'm sure the Accurist GT5000 and Insane GT-R are monumentally capable, but if it's like a Playwithyourselfstation, WTF's the point?
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 01:28 AM
  #45  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves,May 13 2008, 10:22 AM
...WTF's the point?
The point is you can win the stats phallus contest with your mates at the gym...
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 01:36 AM
  #46  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

...or Top Trumps, in the playground.

But us sociopaths find such antics tiresome and childish.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 08:03 AM
  #47  
ge2's Avatar
ge2
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,099
Likes: 0
From: Leigh-On-Sea
Default

It's a shame to read that about the Audi RSs, I'm very interested in fast estates and really want everyone to be wrong about how dull they are.

Is it really too difficult to make them the way they should be or are the buyers only interested in straight line speed? I suspect the latter.

Mind you, I'm starting to wonder if a fun barge is such a good idea, it's looks like I've managed to warp the discs on my Legacy. Oops
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 08:41 AM
  #48  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

Don't worry;

I went past a carpet crawly sweaty suit in a 330d who felt the need to overtake me and then hold me up by grovelling along at 80 until he registered that I was off school the day they taught playing silly far king games.

Just when you think there's some hope, you realise that the sterotypes are there for a reason.

Bit like Jap cars with undersized brakes, really!
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #49  
gaddafi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31,739
Likes: 69
From: Survivalist enclave
Default

[QUOTE=MarkB,May 13 2008, 08:49 AM] I can't get past the feeling that all these cars are for people who want to travel quickly, rather than drive quickly IYSWIM.

Technological tour des forces for sure, but not for me.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #50  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

I'd say pleasant to drive, personally.

BMWs have well weighted & spaced controls (by German standards) and the mass distribution etc, etc.

The NSX, is, like many Hondas, pleasant to drive.

A lot of car are like that; no really nasty traits, and engaging, rewarding nature.

I'd argue that other cars require more of a fight, which makes them wearing, but entertaining nonetheless, such as Ferrairs and Loti and possibly S2000s. Or in the case of some of the M's rivals/compatriots, poorly weighted and spaced controls, in order to make them SEEM more impressive than they really are.

Of course, some cars have basically sound characteristics, but are too dumbed-down to pass the well-weighted (and therefore rewarding) control test. Many Vauxhalls/Toyota/Ppingponggs spring to mind and are simply unrewarding/pointless to drive
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:53 PM.