Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

Which RV?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:20 AM
  #1  
Pasquale Bruno's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default Which RV?

Hi folks,

Ive not posted on hear for ages, but still read on a regular basis. I was looking for a wee bit of info.

I have recently accepted a new job, which involves a much longer commute and this twined with the misses dropping gentle hints at perhaps needing a 4 door car have got me thinking that it might not be a bad idea to have a look.

I would be keen to stay with Honda as 'touch wood' ive never had any real issues and I'm confident in the reliability. I also like the thought of it being a larger (taller) car so have ruled out Civic or the Accord.

Guess what I am asking for is user info from people that have owned/driven the C-RV,H-Rv and F-RV and their recomendations

The budget would be around £5-£6k.

Thanks in advance
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 06:31 AM
  #2  
soulcrew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,680
Likes: 0
From: OLD SOUTH WALES
Default

i had an frv.

Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 06:44 AM
  #3  
unclefester's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,330
Likes: 180
Default

I had an HR-V for 3 years, the baby VTEC 1.6.

Pros - Great fun, easy to get into, easy to drive, fairly cool looking, handy in snow / foul weather with the 4WD.

Cons - thirsty for a 1.6, not that big inside, not that cool looking inside, noisy on motorways.

If i was going for a 4 door 'big' honda, i'd want a CR-V with the 2.2 Diesel engine.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 08:59 AM
  #4  
Pasquale Bruno's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default

Soulcrew, fancy shedding any more info, any good?

Cheers Fester, I liked the HRV, but if its noisy and thirsty im guessing it wont be ideal for the commute. Was it noisy and thirsty in comparrison to the 2 or in general?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 09:33 AM
  #5  
eSeM's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 39,548
Likes: 11
From: City Of London / Knebworth
Default

I have a 2ltr CRV. It is pleasant to drive but it drinks petrol when my wife drives it around town (~20mpg).

I would therfore look at the 2.2 Diesel if you are doing a lot of miles.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 10:24 AM
  #6  
chrisr111's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 11
From: MUGEN 無限 POWER
Default

^^^^

I've got the diesel, worst it does is 38 mpg.

Chris.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 10:24 AM
  #7  
soulcrew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,680
Likes: 0
From: OLD SOUTH WALES
Default

i had the 2.2 diesel .

good engine.


liked the car was good for the kids.

not a bad drive.

now the ex has it.

grrrrrrr.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 22, 2010 | 10:57 AM
  #8  
martin j's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,432
Likes: 312
From: Dunfermline.
Default

I've drive lots when with Honda, personally I liked the FRV but if you'd get one in that price range I'm not sure so otherwise it'd be the CRV, hated the HRV(hormone replacement vehicle), diesels are best.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 11:28 AM
  #9  
unclefester's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,330
Likes: 180
Default

Originally Posted by Pasquale Bruno,Jul 22 2010, 05:59 PM
Soulcrew, fancy shedding any more info, any good?

Cheers Fester, I liked the HRV, but if its noisy and thirsty im guessing it wont be ideal for the commute. Was it noisy and thirsty in comparrison to the 2 or in general?
It was generally noisy and for the mediocre performance you had to wring from it, economy was dire.

Great fun, happy to have owned it but would not want to own one again.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 01:14 PM
  #10  
arsie's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 11,504
Likes: 241
From: Sunny Norf*ck
Default

I would look at Subaru too.

Bulletproof reliability and a range of body styles
i.e. Forester, Outback, Impreza (Legacy is low like Accord)
all of which utilise the same safe and sure-footed AWD/boxer engine design.

At your budget they didn't yet (6 years ago) do a diesel but the turbo ones sure shift ass.

I looked at and tested against the CRV but didn't like the spare wheel outside and conversely preferred the spare under the boot floor as the floor is, as a result, not so low (so our smallish dogs can see out more easily )

Subaru or CRV can be had 6 years old/60,000 miles for around your budget.

Participation in the WRC (World Rally Championship) has helped Subaru refine the symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system, which is the heart of every Subaru. The engine, transmission, driveshaft and rear differential are laid out in a straight line. By closely balancing the body left and right and keeping components close to the chassis’ centerline, Subaru vehicles are exceptionally agile, yet extremely stable. The boxer engine’s compact dimensions allow it to be placed further back in the chassis, reducing weight ahead of the front wheels and allowing quicker reaction to steering inputs, and its lower center of gravity significantly enhances stability in turns and evasive maneuvers.
It's a very easy car to drive, as my missus will testify. This link explains about their AWD (All Wheel Drive).
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:28 PM.