No... they should bring it back for the sake of the workforce.

Have you never had alcohol at a business lunch?

 

Yes, many times... but it has not been the standard practice at every lunch.



But do you not think it would boost the economy?

 

No.


Why would it?

 

Because if every person who went out to lunch was required to have two martinis at $6 buck each, that's $12 per person, multiplied by 5 days per week $60, times 52 weeks per year is $3120, multiplied by the millions in the U.S. that sh!t adds up!



What do you think now?

 

I think I'll have another, bartender.

Does NP really think I'm or that I have at work?

 

p.s. A conservative estimate of U.S. residents of drinking age would be approximately 170,000,000... times $3120 per year equates to an estimated $530 Billion dollars per year...

 

No.

Do you realize the millions spent on s equals the millions that would not be spent on something else?

 

I need more information.


Can you elaborate?

 

Take you for example. If you spend $12 a day for drinks, you are not spending that $12 on something else (including just saving it). The net result is zero to the economy.

Make sense?

 

Doubtful. Instead it keeps my money in the US at local bars and restaurants.


Make sense?