The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

Apparently (II) ...

Old Nov 2, 2004 | 06:54 AM
  #1141  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Apparently I just got tin from voting
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 06:56 AM
  #1142  
Superbabe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,046
Likes: 0
From: Apparently WAY OUT
Default

Apparently I just let it out. ALL

Apparently it's gonna be a long night for me finding out who's gonna be pres
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 06:59 AM
  #1143  
BFAmazon35's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn
Default

Apparently I am happy now cause Superbabe feels better

Old Nov 2, 2004 | 07:03 AM
  #1144  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

Originally Posted by Chazmo,Nov 2 2004, 10:28 AM
Jeff, so sorry it was such a fuck up! I hear what you're saying, and that kind of bad stuff can definitely put people off in the future.

Ultimately, I hope we'll all be voting online someday, and we'll abolish the electoral college. Well, hey, I can dream.
Not the end of the world. I have a very flexible job where it was a non issue. My roomate works 8-6 (polls close at 6 here) without much flexibility on Tuesdays, and I'm not sure she'll get a chance to vote - since she would have been at least a half hour behind me in line.

My past voting experiences (one absentee in 2000 and two minor elections in a different district) were quick and painless. I'm not entirely sure what happened this morning, but it was frustrating.

And yes, someday I suspect voting will be online, though ridding us of the electoral college poses all sorts of problems.
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 07:05 AM
  #1145  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

Actually, what I'd really like to see is the formal voting day moved to Saturday. It would spread the day out and make it much easier for people to vote.

I don't see the Republicans ever letting that happen though, as it would severely hurt their strength, just like getting rid of the electoral college.
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 07:08 AM
  #1146  
Chazmo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,315
Likes: 45
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

Interesting, Jeff... Do you think that the Republicans have a more vested interest in the electoral college than other parties? I mean, obviously, it worked in the Republicans favor in 2000, but is that a permanent advantage, so to speak?
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 07:14 AM
  #1147  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Originally Posted by Chazmo,Nov 2 2004, 11:08 AM
Interesting, Jeff... Do you think that the Republicans have a more vested interest in the electoral college than other parties? I mean, obviously, it worked in the Republicans favor in 2000, but is that a permanent advantage, so to speak?
Apparently anything backwards ass and out of touch works in the Republicans favor
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 07:23 AM
  #1148  
Chazmo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,315
Likes: 45
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

Hmm... What do you really think, Mikey!
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 07:24 AM
  #1149  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

Originally Posted by Chazmo,Nov 2 2004, 11:08 AM
Interesting, Jeff... Do you think that the Republicans have a more vested interest in the electoral college than other parties? I mean, obviously, it worked in the Republicans favor in 2000, but is that a permanent advantage, so to speak?
Without a doubt.

Our electoral college makes less populated states stronger in relation to their population than the more heavily populated ones. Essentially a measure of voting power - someone in Wyoming has vastly more power than someone in Cali, even though Cali is more significant in terms of winning the election. And the less populated states tend to be more conservative; while the heavily populated coasts and upper midwest tend to be liberal (or at least middle of the road). Florida and Ohio seem to be the anomolies.

Without an electoral college, the GOP couldn't rely on the vast swath of less densely populated states in the middle and south of the US, because they simply don't have many people. They'd have to go after the big 30 (cities) - nearly all of which would tend to be a bit more liberal (as they see the benefits of the Democratic platform). For example, rural texas is very conservative; while Houston and Dallas (the 4th and 6th largest cities, I think) tend to be a bit liberal, and Austin is very liberal. In the EC, Democrats really have no chance to overcome that immensely conservative area; without an EC the Democrats could simply target Houston/Dallas/SanAntonio/Austin and let the ranchers and smaller cities vote GOP. It would significantly change the dynamics of the election; and it'd probably favor the Democratic party quite a bit.
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 07:24 AM
  #1150  
DERF's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
From: Da Zoo
Default

Apparently the weather sucks today.

= Voting today may take a hour or so.

= School still Sucks.

= Superbabe and BFAmazon35 are felling better.

= All the Jell-O has been consumed.

= Mayor Mc Cheese won't win this year.

= We should know who the new Big Cheese will be, later tonight.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:59 AM.