The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

mike is being punished

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 09:30 AM
  #271  
Chazmo's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,315
Likes: 45
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

It depends on how much storage space you need, Mike. But, almost certainly, yes. Raid is available at low cost these days (because the brains for doing it is being built into standard server hardware).


The bigger decisions will revolve around how much storage, what technology to use (fibre channel, external storage arrays, ...)
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 09:42 AM
  #272  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Originally Posted by Chazmo,Sep 23 2006, 01:30 PM
It depends on how much storage space you need, Mike. But, almost certainly, yes. Raid is available at low cost these days (because the brains for doing it is being built into standard server hardware).


The bigger decisions will revolve around how much storage, what technology to use (fibre channel, external storage arrays, ...)
Nothing fancy, and not a ton of storage needed, mainly going to be running a Filemaker solution..the thing that scares me is Filemaker is not a transactional DB, so I want lots of redundancy. I was thinking (2, or3) 500 gig drives in the empty bays.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #273  
Chazmo's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,315
Likes: 45
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

RAID (if used properly) has the advantage that a single drive failure will not lose or corrupt data, Mike. That's the coolness of it. Later, when you get a fixed drive, you can toss it in and the drive will be brought back into the RAID set.

Yup, redundancy is a good idea.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 11:49 AM
  #274  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

So in essence being redundant is a good thing...redundancy is good! Redundantly speaking of course.


RAID it is then!
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 11:56 AM
  #275  
wicky's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

Originally Posted by Chazmo,Sep 23 2006, 08:10 AM
It's probably a massive backup, Mike.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 12:29 PM
  #276  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #277  
Chazmo's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,315
Likes: 45
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

Nothing like a massive backup.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 01:39 PM
  #278  
PeaceLove&S2K's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 19,257
Likes: 19
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by mikes2k,Sep 23 2006, 12:42 PM
Nothing fancy, and not a ton of storage needed, mainly going to be running a Filemaker solution..the thing that scares me is Filemaker is not a transactional DB, so I want lots of redundancy. I was thinking (2, or3) 500 gig drives in the empty bays.
Get a SAN.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 01:47 PM
  #279  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Originally Posted by Chazmo,Sep 23 2006, 04:45 PM
Nothing like a massive backup.
Nothing a good mantie RAID cant clear!
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 01:50 PM
  #280  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Originally Posted by PeaceLove&S2K,Sep 23 2006, 05:39 PM
Get a SAN.
Thank yousan!

Gonna go with this and fill the 4 empty bays with big drives and RAID them.
http://www.apple.com/macpro/
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:09 PM.