Terri Schiavo?
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Originally Posted by wicky,Jul 12 2006, 01:33 PM
you'd do the same if you were God... just to screw with us... like the platypus... what the hell is that thing? 
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: So Cali
Originally Posted by zdave87,Jul 11 2006, 03:47 AM
Haven't you noticed that when you present to BITSA facts that contradict what he says (and cuts/copies/pastes)-he has no response?
BITSA June 29 2006 09:05 PM
Your humble and lovable servant zdave87 in response:
Source? http://www.storyofpakistan.com
BITSA Jul 1 2006 09:23 AM
Your humble and lovable real internet friend zdave87
(When did January become Januaary?)
BITSA Jul 9 2006 11:03 PM
zdave87
BITSA
zdave87
And one of my personal favorites:
BITSA (whilst naming his own thread to mock the President)
zdave87
BITSA June 29 2006 09:05 PM
Your humble and lovable servant zdave87 in response:
Source? http://www.storyofpakistan.com
BITSA Jul 1 2006 09:23 AM
Your humble and lovable real internet friend zdave87
(When did January become Januaary?)
BITSA Jul 9 2006 11:03 PM
zdave87
BITSA
zdave87
And one of my personal favorites:
BITSA (whilst naming his own thread to mock the President)
zdave87
As for my typos with respect to the words "January"and "idiocy": Wow, Dave, you are indeed terribly dessperrate.
As for the source of the January 14, 2000 quote; it is, of course, the little moron himself. You see, Dave, that was who I, well, quooted. As for the particular Internet-based compilation of said quote, it was either Slate.com or About:Politicalhumor.com. You see, Dave, there are several such Internet-based compilations.
Finally. My figure of 30,000 nuclear warheads may-well be incorrect. For to factor in MIRVs, the total number of nuclear bombs in the US nuclear arsenal may-well exceed 30,000. (Yeah, that's it, Dave, google "MIRV.")
In any event, Dave, regardless the number - 1, 30,000 or, say, 1,000,000, the little moron simply isn't bright enough to be charged with such an awesome responsibility.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 65,827
Likes: 2
From: FCUK
Originally Posted by BITSA,Jul 13 2006, 10:33 AM
Yes, Dave, Muhammad Rafiq Tarar was allowed to remain in office until 2001. Ergo, he was the president of Pakistan during the time in which Commander AWOL Cokespoon was asked to identify him.
As for my typos with respect to the words "January"and "idiocy": Wow, Dave, you are indeed terribly dessperrate.
As for the source of the January 14, 2000 quote; it is, of course, the little moron himself. You see, Dave, that was who I, well, quooted. As for the particular Internet-based compilation of said quote, it was either Slate.com or About:Politicalhumor.com. You see, Dave, there are several such Internet-based compilations.
Finally. My figure of 30,000 nuclear warheads may-well be incorrect. For to factor in MIRVs, the total number of nuclear bombs in the US nuclear arsenal may-well exceed 30,000. (Yeah, that's it, Dave, google "MIRV.")
In any event, Dave, regardless the number - 1, 30,000 or, say, 1,000,000, the little moron simply isn't bright enough to be charged with such an awesome responsibility.
As for my typos with respect to the words "January"and "idiocy": Wow, Dave, you are indeed terribly dessperrate.
As for the source of the January 14, 2000 quote; it is, of course, the little moron himself. You see, Dave, that was who I, well, quooted. As for the particular Internet-based compilation of said quote, it was either Slate.com or About:Politicalhumor.com. You see, Dave, there are several such Internet-based compilations.
Finally. My figure of 30,000 nuclear warheads may-well be incorrect. For to factor in MIRVs, the total number of nuclear bombs in the US nuclear arsenal may-well exceed 30,000. (Yeah, that's it, Dave, google "MIRV.")
In any event, Dave, regardless the number - 1, 30,000 or, say, 1,000,000, the little moron simply isn't bright enough to be charged with such an awesome responsibility.
Dave Dave Dave
