The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

Terri Schiavo?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #951  
B1TSA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: So Cali
Default

Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 09:45 PM
  #952  
wicky's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

Originally Posted by jedwards,Jul 12 2006, 10:14 PM
Sorry... I wasn't listening. BITSA did you say something?
who?


here's a rofl for ya Jed:


Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 09:57 PM
  #953  
tokyo_james's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 65,827
Likes: 2
From: FCUK
Default

blah blah blah blah MIRVs blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:02 PM
  #954  
Metalhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: So Cali
Default

Originally Posted by BITSA,Jul 12 2006, 06:33 PM
Yes, Dave, Muhammad Rafiq Tarar was allowed to remain in office until 2001. Ergo, he was the president of Pakistan during the time in which Commander AWOL Cokespoon was asked to identify him.

As for my typos with respect to the words "January"and "idiocy": Wow, Dave, you are indeed terribly dessperrate.


As for the source of the January 14, 2000 quote; it is, of course, the little moron himself. You see, Dave, that was who I, well, quooted. As for the particular Internet-based compilation of said quote, it was either Slate.com or About:Politicalhumor.com. You see, Dave, there are several such Internet-based compilations.


Finally. My figure of 30,000 nuclear warheads may-well be incorrect. For to factor in MIRVs, the total number of nuclear bombs in the US nuclear arsenal may-well exceed 30,000. (Yeah, that's it, Dave, google "MIRV.")
In any event, Dave, regardless the number - 1, 30,000 or, say, 1,000,000, the little moron simply isn't bright enough to be charged with such an awesome responsibility.
Nice "response," PlagiaristBoyDave87..

You see, PlagiaristBoyDave87, your average of 37.9-posts-per-day more than suggests that you, short of your understandable need to avoid my responses, have more than enough time with which to respond to me missives. On the other hand, PlagiaristBoyDave87, me paltry average of but 5.4 posts-per-day serves to indicate that, despite your idiocy to the contrary, I do in fact and eventually respond to all that is at least half-assed meaningful. For I have a life, loser!
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:13 PM
  #955  
wicky's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

Originally Posted by BITSA,Jul 13 2006, 09:02 PM
For I have a life, loser!
then why are you in here so much with us no lifers dumbass? Your life is waiting for you BITSA !!!

here's three rofl's for your 'life'

Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:13 PM
  #956  
wicky's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

PS - go answer my question you chicken shit.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:15 PM
  #957  
shareall's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 64,605
Likes: 1,226
Default

I'm no math whiz, but taking into consideration flood control, I believe it actually takes less than 10 minutes to post 37.9 times per day. How exactly does that equate to someone having no life?



Unless you have to use the thesaurus for every word in a 10 line post...Hmm yeah I could see how that could add on a significant amount of time.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:15 PM
  #958  
BITCHSA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: So Cali
Default

Originally Posted by BITSA,Jul 13 2006, 11:02 PM
I like poo poo

I like poo poo

I like poo poo,

I like POO POO
Dude, shut the hell up... you're embarassing us both!!!

You really should stick to letting me control us.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:17 PM
  #959  
BITCHSA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: So Cali
Default

Originally Posted by BITSA,Jul 13 2006, 11:02 PM
Why won't mikey PEE on ME

Why won't mikey PEE-on-ME!!

Why won't mikey PEE-on-ME!!!

It's NICE and WARM!


:sigh:
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 08:18 PM
  #960  
wicky's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

Originally Posted by shareall,Jul 13 2006, 09:15 PM
I'm no math whiz, but taking into consideration flood control, I believe it actually takes less than 10 minutes to post 37.9 times per day. How exactly does that equate to someone having no life?



Unless you have to use the thesaurus for every word in a 10 line post...Hmm yeah I could see how that could add on a significant amount of time.
that's because you aren't overcomplicating your explanation of the so called 'facts' by a factor of 10

plus you didn't have any rofl's included.

here have some of mine:

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:16 AM.