Terri Schiavo?
Originally Posted by BITSA,Jul 12 2006, 06:33 PM
Yes, Dave, Muhammad Rafiq Tarar was allowed to remain in office until 2001. Ergo, he was the president of Pakistan during the time in which Commander AWOL Cokespoon was asked to identify him.
As for my typos with respect to the words "January"and "idiocy": Wow, Dave, you are indeed terribly dessperrate.
As for the source of the January 14, 2000 quote; it is, of course, the little moron himself. You see, Dave, that was who I, well, quooted. As for the particular Internet-based compilation of said quote, it was either Slate.com or About:Politicalhumor.com. You see, Dave, there are several such Internet-based compilations.
Finally. My figure of 30,000 nuclear warheads may-well be incorrect. For to factor in MIRVs, the total number of nuclear bombs in the US nuclear arsenal may-well exceed 30,000. (Yeah, that's it, Dave, google "MIRV.")
In any event, Dave, regardless the number - 1, 30,000 or, say, 1,000,000, the little moron simply isn't bright enough to be charged with such an awesome responsibility.
As for my typos with respect to the words "January"and "idiocy": Wow, Dave, you are indeed terribly dessperrate.
As for the source of the January 14, 2000 quote; it is, of course, the little moron himself. You see, Dave, that was who I, well, quooted. As for the particular Internet-based compilation of said quote, it was either Slate.com or About:Politicalhumor.com. You see, Dave, there are several such Internet-based compilations.
Finally. My figure of 30,000 nuclear warheads may-well be incorrect. For to factor in MIRVs, the total number of nuclear bombs in the US nuclear arsenal may-well exceed 30,000. (Yeah, that's it, Dave, google "MIRV.")
In any event, Dave, regardless the number - 1, 30,000 or, say, 1,000,000, the little moron simply isn't bright enough to be charged with such an awesome responsibility.
You see, PlagiaristBoyDave87, your average of 37.9-posts-per-day more than suggests that you, short of your understandable need to avoid my responses, have more than enough time with which to respond to me missives. On the other hand, PlagiaristBoyDave87, me paltry average of but 5.4 posts-per-day serves to indicate that, despite your idiocy to the contrary, I do in fact and eventually respond to all that is at least half-assed meaningful. For I have a life, loser!
Originally Posted by BITSA,Jul 13 2006, 09:02 PM
For I have a life, loser!
here's three rofl's for your 'life'
I'm no math whiz, but taking into consideration flood control, I believe it actually takes less than 10 minutes to post 37.9 times per day. How exactly does that equate to someone having no life?
Unless you have to use the thesaurus for every word in a 10 line post...Hmm yeah I could see how that could add on a significant amount of time.
Unless you have to use the thesaurus for every word in a 10 line post...Hmm yeah I could see how that could add on a significant amount of time.
Originally Posted by BITSA,Jul 13 2006, 11:02 PM
I like poo poo
I like poo poo
I like poo poo,
I like POO POO
I like poo poo
I like poo poo,
I like POO POO
you're embarassing us both!!!
You really should stick to letting
me control us.
Originally Posted by shareall,Jul 13 2006, 09:15 PM
I'm no math whiz, but taking into consideration flood control, I believe it actually takes less than 10 minutes to post 37.9 times per day. How exactly does that equate to someone having no life?
Unless you have to use the thesaurus for every word in a 10 line post...Hmm yeah I could see how that could add on a significant amount of time.
Unless you have to use the thesaurus for every word in a 10 line post...Hmm yeah I could see how that could add on a significant amount of time.plus you didn't have any rofl's included.
here have some of mine:









