The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

you guys suck!

Thread Tools
 
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:04 PM
  #41  
ltweintz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 18,759
Likes: 0
From: Wheeler Army Airfield, HI
Default

Then it sounds like a good fit.

Most likely it has compact flash and secure digital.
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:05 PM
  #42  
brantshali's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
Default

High speed like as in 100mbps or just higher than 10mbps?
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:11 PM
  #43  
ltweintz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 18,759
Likes: 0
From: Wheeler Army Airfield, HI
Default

Originally posted by brantshali
High speed like as in 100mbps or just higher than 10mbps?
This is the wireless speed breakdown:

802.11b = 11 Mbps on 2.4 GHz - currently most common
802.11g = 54 Mbps on 2.4 GHz
802.11a = 54 Mbps on 5 GHz

The speed becomes more important with wireless because it is shared among all devices connected to the access point. Picture a 54 Mbps pie....each person gets a slice until it's gone...then no more bandwidth. With a wired CAT5 connection....that PC gets the whole pie.
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:11 PM
  #44  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

Just set up an 802.11G wireless for my mom, 54mbps, it rocks!
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:14 PM
  #45  
brantshali's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
Default

54mbps ain't too shabby. Not sure I want to see the prices on the early stuff, though...
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:17 PM
  #46  
brantshali's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
Default

For connecting to computers within the LAN, 54 is a major upgrade. For connecting to the internet 11 is fine since that's about the max of most of their high speed networks anyway...

I'm glad to see more of the industry embracing wireless. It's got a great number of technical hurdles (bandwidth sharing, etc.) but the payoffs are worth it when it comes to the flexibility of manipulating the physical elements of the network.
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:21 PM
  #47  
RiceBurnerTX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ltweintz
[B]

This is the wireless speed breakdown:

802.11b = 11 Mbps on 2.4 GHz - currently most common
802.11g = 54 Mbps on 2.4 GHz
802.11a = 54 Mbps on 5 GHz

The speed becomes more important with wireless because it is shared among all devices connected to the access point.
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:26 PM
  #48  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by brantshali
[B]54mbps ain't too shabby.
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:34 PM
  #49  
brantshali's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
Default

That's actually not bad for 54Mbps, Mike. Might have to look into that...
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:37 PM
  #50  
brantshali's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 52,827
Likes: 17
From: State of Confusion
Default

RiceBurnerTX, I believe it's like the difference between DSL and cable modem. With DSL you have a dedicated amount of bandwidth which is similar to a CAT 5 cable from your PC to the switch/hub/access point. With cable modem you actually share the bandwidth with everyone in your neighborhood and the company theoretically limits the number of people going through a given access point to guarantee you bandwidth...much like you would do with Wi-Fi.

I think...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:06 AM.