S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

THE OFFICIAL: WATER/METHANOL INJECTION Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #1  
JoeyBalls's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,570
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
Post THE OFFICIAL: WATER/METHANOL INJECTION Thread

Why Water Methanol Injection?

In gasoline engines, as with any intercooler, this suppresses detonation so more power producing boost and timing can be utilized. Water, with its high latent heat of vaporization cools the intake charge and combustion. Methanol cools the charge and combustion but also acts like an extremely high octane fuel (some researchers claim as high as 120 octane) as well as adding more oxygen to combustion.

In diesels, the effect is three fold: 1. The intercooling effect provides for more available air and all the benefits of a higher positive pressure ratio (more power giving fuel can be utilized safely without high combustion temperatures). 2. The combustion of water provides for more power on the power stroke. 3. Methanol acts as an additional fuel for more power.

A brief History:
Water injection was evaluated scientifically in the 1930.s by H. Ricardo who demonstrated that one can basically double the power output of an engine using water/methanol. The first widespread use was during WWII on supercharged and turbocharged aircraft. In 1942, the German Luftwaffe increased the horsepower of the Focke-Wulf 190D-9 fighter aircraft from 1776HP to 2240HP using 50/50% water/methanol injection. The allies soon followed by fitting the P51 Mustang and other high performance aircraft with water/methanol injection. Following the war, the turboprop aircraft industry used water/methanol injection and called it the "automatic power reserve system (APR)" for use in hot or high altitude take off. It surfaced again in the 60's when GM used a system on the OEM turbo Corvair. It was used effectively in Formula 1 before being banned for adding too much power.

In recent years, water methanol injection has become ever more popular and recognized as an invaluable tool for both gasoline and diesel forced induction engines as well as naturally aspirated applications. While often times referred to as a
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 06:31 PM
  #2  
SgtB's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,947
Likes: 8
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Aem $395.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 06:36 PM
  #3  
9kFever's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,686
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

Brilliant has the Aquamist kit @ 12psi
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 06:48 PM
  #4  
dsddcd's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 7
From: USA
Default

I like the AEM for the price.

This would be great to couple to my Scramble boost feature. Sounds like I have next summers first project planned. Maybe you could use a t-fitting and spray the intercooler also? Or if it would make enough difference while adding the water.

Great write up, I wish everyone wrote like this.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #5  
TRBOKEV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
From: Phillips Ranch 909!
Default

S2kart also runs water/meth on a homemade kit and still hold the record for most wheel HP.
Brilliant holds the TQ record and IMO this is more important than HP.

(Both are for Greddy kits)
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 12:17 AM
  #6  
Honda_Mad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

My tuner prefers the AIS Stage 2 Digital Progressive Trunk Mount Water Methanol/Alcohol Injection System.

http://www.alcoholinjectionsystems.com/p10...oduct_info.html
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 01:47 AM
  #7  
WindchaserS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong/California
Default

I'm thinking to run the AEM Kit with a Dual Nozzles Setup


Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:05 AM
  #8  
Brutus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 853
Likes: 1
Default


back in the 70's, the question was about calcium and magnesium deposits in the combustion chamber. (from water evaporating) this prospect I wouldnt like at all.
is this a real concern?

another question, is wether 87 octane (instead of 91 or 93) could be used in conjunction with water/alcohol, methanol etc. to save money at the gas pump?

how long will a tank of water last for street driving?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:17 AM
  #9  
brilliant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Brutus,Sep 11 2008, 06:05 AM
back in the 70's, the question was about calcium and magnesium deposits in the combustion chamber. (from water evaporating) this prospect I wouldnt like at all.
is this a real concern?

another question, is wether 87 octane (instead of 91 or 93) could be used in conjunction with water/alcohol, methanol etc. to save money at the gas pump?

how long will a tank of water last for street driving?
1. I wouldn't use 87
2. Depends on how your system is mapped. Mine comes on at 5psi. So thus, it depends on how you drive.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 06:30 AM
  #10  
nightcrawler7188's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,158
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by dsddcd,Sep 10 2008, 10:48 PM
I like the AEM for the price.

This would be great to couple to my Scramble boost feature. Sounds like I have next summers first project planned. Maybe you could use a t-fitting and spray the intercooler also? Or if it would make enough difference while adding the water.

Great write up, I wish everyone wrote like this.
i think if you are running an air to air intercooler it would make a difference...but if you're running an air-liquid aftercooler setup not so much...it would have to cool the radiator which cools the coolant which cools the radiator inside the aftercooler unit which cools the air...too long of a process for some spray on the outside of the radiator to make a significant difference imo if you were running air to air though it seems like a better option since you're cooling the intercooler which cools the air directly...but i could be wrong.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 AM.