Mid-Atlantic S2000 Owners Members from Maryland, DC and Virginia

Ladies & Gentleman - changes are coming...

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 08:22 AM
  #11  
sweetj's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 34,298
Likes: 2
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

^ How do you figure
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 08:25 AM
  #12  
Poindexter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,162
Likes: 3
From: Burlington, VT
Default

Originally Posted by SanMarinoCpe,Mar 17 2005, 11:35 AM
This will definately change what we will be able to do for the S community including Mid-A
Why is that?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 08:30 AM
  #13  
gfacter's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 16,703
Likes: 74
From: High Knob Mountain
Default

Aren't we paying a annual fee?

We should be able (in good taste of course) to put anything in our signature IMO.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 08:32 AM
  #14  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Poindexter,Mar 17 2005, 12:25 PM
Why is that?
I'm guessing "less visibilty" leads to fewer sales. Lower volumes would lead to less discounts. So forth and so on.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 08:35 AM
  #15  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by gfacter,Mar 17 2005, 12:30 PM
Aren't we paying a annual fee?

We should be able (in good taste of course) to put anything in our signature IMO.
I upgraded to "gold" to help offset the meet in Cali(which I was unable to attend).

I understand paying sponsors complaining about others getting free advertisement through sigs. I also understand that some folks have huge-a$$ sigs. But as George stated, I have paid for my spot on the board. I'll take the picture out of my sig, but I think I should be able to keep my links.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 08:38 AM
  #16  
Nandska's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17,254
Likes: 75
From: VA
Default

It does make sense to allow vendors that pay the fee to have members have it in their signature (if they choose too)

I think I wrote that right.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 08:42 AM
  #17  
efthimios's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,430
Likes: 1
From: OH
Default

Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Mar 17 2005, 10:28 AM
Alex, I recently added a picture. Is my sig now too large?
hope not..that pic is BADA$$
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 09:11 AM
  #18  
sweetj's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 34,298
Likes: 2
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Skip, you can keep the pic but not the links

There are only specific Vendors and Sponsors who actually pay to have advertising!
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 09:59 AM
  #19  
SanMarinoCpe's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,209
Likes: 1
From: Day Trader
Default

Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Mar 17 2005, 12:32 PM
I'm guessing "less visibilty" leads to fewer sales. Lower volumes would lead to less discounts. So forth and so on.
Its not so much that, This is going to make for good discussion at the mod-day which I will leave my thoughts and opinions to. This is not something I want to talk about on this site.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2005 | 01:08 PM
  #20  
1AP12NV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,268
Likes: 0
From: Rockville
Default

I don't think the commercial links would be a problem provided that they were for boad sponsors.

I say if its the vendors that are complaining, limit the commercial links to those that link to sponsors.

While its dfinitely true that this boar is privately owned so the owners can "do anything they want," if they want to keep running it, I hope they realize that they need members and sponsors. I'd hate to see them alienate any of either group.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:19 PM.