Mid-Atlantic S2000 Owners Members from Maryland, DC and Virginia

Laptop

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 01:52 PM
  #61  
Black Nugget's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 28,183
Likes: 0
From: local courts ...
Default

Originally Posted by magikcow,Aug 15 2007, 04:51 PM
my pick is the vostro. It's small business meaning that you might actually stand a chance getting a person that speaks english with tech support
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 02:32 PM
  #62  
TepEvan's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 53,292
Likes: 789
From: Owings Mills, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Loving,Aug 15 2007, 04:45 PM
I just pick up a Inspiron laptop from Dell through their scratch and dent outlet. These are brand new laptops that have some cosmetic defects. I paid $760.00 for a 1.86 Duo Core 2 processor, 2 GIG of RAM, 17" screen, 120 GIG harddrive (which is way more than what I needed) and a DVD/RW. These laptops are pre-configurated so, I would check the site a few times a day looking for something that I wanted. They add new laptops every hour or so.

FYI, I can not find any scratches or dents. What I did notice is the trim peices are white and the case is silver and that didn't matter to me.
I gotta think about the whole thing Chad, but what Mike says here is definitely true. Dent & Scratch or open box specials (since both are usually fully guaranteed to work). Mike, you got a great deal IMO.

I told my bro-in-law that the things he wants to look for in a laptop are, more memory, decent sized harddrive, 14"+ screen and if possible, a non-integrated graphics card (sometimes expensive).
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 02:33 PM
  #63  
MacGyver's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,134
Likes: 3
From: Columbia, MD
Default

MS has guaranteed (due to customer bitching) they will actively support XP for at least 2 more years. I'm still getting updates and hotfixes for my Win2000 system (though I just downloaded all of the hotfixes to cut to CD, just in case).

IMO, trying to run Vista on a laptop is a bad choice... if you want the extra features, it sucks down your battery life. MS recently released some "fixes" for it... essentially it determines whether you are plugged into the wall or nt. If you're plugged in (and you have the processor power), it enables the features, disables them by default when you unplug. Personally, I'll give up kick-ass looking Aero windows for that extra hour of battery life. You can't run both cores on the processor for free, and Aero (among other items) sits there chugging away on the second processor. Imagine being 10 minutes away from a mavie's end on a long plane ride and your laptop shuts down because the battery is low. I'd go for XP...
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 02:40 PM
  #64  
TepEvan's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 53,292
Likes: 789
From: Owings Mills, MD
Default

I agree with most of the things cow said. Intel over AMD, his Price/Benefits arguement, Vista (premium, not home or basic) vs XP (unless you're going XP Pro), etc.
I don't agree that the IBM Thinkpad is a good laptop. I think for $700 or less you should be able to find a good deal on a nicely built laptop, *IF* you can wait to buy it
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #65  
magikcow's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,553
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MD
Default

[QUOTE=TepEvan,Aug 15 2007, 05:40 PM] I agree with most of the things cow said.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 03:20 PM
  #66  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by magikcow,Aug 15 2007, 05:28 PM
Civic Si or Ford Focus? I'm pretty sure the focus is larger.
Both are the ghey.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #67  
LiQUiD iCE's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
From: Potomac Falls, VA
Default

Originally Posted by MacGyver,Aug 15 2007, 05:33 PM
MS has guaranteed (due to customer bitching) they will actively support XP for at least 2 more years. I'm still getting updates and hotfixes for my Win2000 system (though I just downloaded all of the hotfixes to cut to CD, just in case).

IMO, trying to run Vista on a laptop is a bad choice... if you want the extra features, it sucks down your battery life. MS recently released some "fixes" for it... essentially it determines whether you are plugged into the wall or nt. If you're plugged in (and you have the processor power), it enables the features, disables them by default when you unplug. Personally, I'll give up kick-ass looking Aero windows for that extra hour of battery life. You can't run both cores on the processor for free, and Aero (among other items) sits there chugging away on the second processor. Imagine being 10 minutes away from a mavie's end on a long plane ride and your laptop shuts down because the battery is low. I'd go for XP...
Support = phone support and patches for security mostly though. After this year, you'll see few hotfixes for actual problems unless they are severe on XP, and less and less driver support from manufacturers. Windows 2000 reaches end of support at the end of this year, I know because we've been scrambling to upgrade our Windows 2000 servers to 2003 (yes we're slow). That means no new patches or phone support. XP still has life left in it, but since its the same exact money, Vista is the way to go. According to benchmarks, Vista with Aero disabled is more power efficient than XP is. So, like you said, just disable Aero.

As far as Aero sucking down your 2nd processor, thats just completely untrue. I'm sitting here on a Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz with Vista Ultimate running Aero, and my CPU usage is currently under 10%. The only thing using processor time right now is Firefox and thats because I'm typing into a Firefox window. If I stop typing CPU usage drops to below 5%, and most of that comes from the Task manager.

As far as Lenovo ThinkPads, I think their high end laptops are amongst the best laptops on the market, but they cost a pretty penny. They are road worthy laptops, in other words they are built to last versus most laptops. The problem is just that they cost more money for what you get.

Although all new Dell laptops are what they call "Road Ready" (Link: http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global....=us&l=en&s=gen) which basically means they do stuff like open and close the lid to make sure that the hinges aren't going to break prematurely or the connection to the monitor isn't going to come loose.

I'd still recommend you wait until tomorrow to see what Dell's new deals are tomorrow.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 03:51 PM
  #68  
nautilist's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
From: Nova
Default

[QUOTE=magikcow,Aug 15 2007, 06:44 PM]I've never had a problem with the IBM thinkpad.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 03:52 PM
  #69  
MsPerky's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 45,174
Likes: 4,094
From: Arlington, VA
Default

I've had a Sony Vaio for over three years. It's been great for me, but there are so many options, it can be confusing. Good luck!
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 04:09 PM
  #70  
LiQUiD iCE's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
From: Potomac Falls, VA
Default

Originally Posted by nautilist,Aug 15 2007, 06:51 PM


Doused mine with a big cup of green tea - to the point where I had to shake water out of it (after screaming like a schoolgirl) - and it didn't blink an eye. Can't say I've experienced similar spillage on any other machine, but FWIW... IBM/Lenovo laptops are solid.

As far as Vista/XP, I'm still in the XP camp... XP end of life is next year only for retailers/OEM.. they'll continue to support it for at least another year after that, and I'm guessing they'll extend that even further due to slow Vista adoption..

Right now, I can't really see the point in using extra precious clock cycles / battery on things like aero when there's a good *stable* platform in xp ready to go, for cheap. If all you're looking to do is basic IM/office, I don't see the need for Vista.
The thing is, if you had the choice for the same exact price on XP or Vista, you're not a gamer, and you can disable Aero for battery life thats BETTER than Vista, which would you choose? Thats the point of view I'm coming from. There's no real drawbacks for the average user to upgrade. Gamers should still stay away, and for existing computers there's probably not a good reason to spend the money upgrading -- but when it costs you nothing to go with Vista Home Premium vs. XP, I say go with Vista.

Just makes sense to me go to with Vista for new PCs.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:58 AM.