Mid-Atlantic S2000 Owners Members from Maryland, DC and Virginia

My Tuning at PTuning

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #11  
Olegator's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,641
Likes: 1
From: Gaithersburg, MD
Default

The drivability is awesome, feels smoother then before.
My butt dyno says that it's faster too, but the ultimate test will be when I race my friends' 03 stock s2k, then we'll see if it was worth it...

They did explain everything, plus I was not expecting any miracles in terms of gaining like 20 hp
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #12  
thewhitepearl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

glad it feels good...but man, I really have to get used to S2k tunes coming from STI land

Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #13  
warman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: Linthicum, Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by LiQUiD iCE,Aug 25 2008, 08:12 PM
With my EMS, after getting tuned I was running right below 13.0 almost the entire time. Maybe its harder to bring the E-Manage to a consistent AFR?

But, isn't the ideal A/F ratio for N/A around 12.5 - 13.3 or so? He's right around that range the entire time.



BTW- I recently switched back to my OEM ECU for a week so I could pass emissions (OBD II connection required), and the car feels considerably slower on the OEM ECU and it doesn't drive as smooth ... go figure

How do you like yours Oleg, does it feel a lot better?
12.5:1 - 13.3:1 is where the most power is reached.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #14  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Olegator,Aug 25 2008, 08:55 PM
The drivability is awesome, feels smoother then before.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 07:08 PM
  #15  
FASTSIIK's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: springfield, va
Default

Originally Posted by Olegator,Aug 25 2008, 01:15 PM
As some of you know, PTuning dyno reads low.
just how low does the dyno run? not to be a downer, but those #'s are kinda low. With the mods you have I would think it would be higher like around 195-205hp being an F20
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 07:14 PM
  #16  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

[QUOTE=FASTSIIK,Aug 25 2008, 11:08 PM] just how low does the dyno run?
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 08:18 PM
  #17  
Olegator's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,641
Likes: 1
From: Gaithersburg, MD
Default

Yeah......well, hopefully emanage will pay off when I go supercharged. But, as I said before, I will run it with my friends' stock s2k ant then we'll see if all those mods were usefull
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 08:19 PM
  #18  
Olegator's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,641
Likes: 1
From: Gaithersburg, MD
Default

the numbers are low, but if you pull up the thread from the dyno day at Ptuning, you'll see that everyone was getting low readings
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #19  
Olegator's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,641
Likes: 1
From: Gaithersburg, MD
Default

Anyways, from my experience now, I advise not to mod the car unless you going forced induction, it's not worth it, unless the part you want to change is broken.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 08:22 PM
  #20  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Olegator,Aug 26 2008, 12:19 AM
the numbers are low, but if you pull up the thread from the dyno day at Ptuning, you'll see that everyone was getting low readings
I think my car only dyno'd 220 on their dyno. That's particularly low considering it was a 2.5L. It read about 30hp lower than it did on a DynoJet. I openly challenged anyone with a comparable dyno sheet to run me.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:17 PM.