New Plates! (erm.. plate?)
New Plates! (erm.. plate?)
It's not that bad is it?
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 28,456
Likes: 228
Originally Posted by Black Nugget,Mar 16 2006, 07:28 PM
Nah, just us Forced Induction guys no comprende 
I'm not sure if Tep's FI or not...-Aaron
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 28,456
Likes: 228
Originally Posted by PopTarts,Mar 16 2006, 08:38 PM
Took about 1 minute. 
One I've considered is "2L 4CYL"
One I've considered is "2L 4CYL"
On my 4.7L Dakota I had NOT N RT. As in, it was not an R/T - the available 5.9L step up from the trim that I had.
Then, on my Scion, I had SLO WHAT. It was slow, and I didn't care.
I got tired of people making such a big deal over it.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 42,366
Likes: 1
From: Yrmom, MD
Originally Posted by e3opian,Mar 17 2006, 12:00 AM
It's ok that it's a little obscure I guess. I'm not much a fan of the obvious. I like to think that my plates are always at least a little clever and require some thinking.
On my 4.7L Dakota I had NOT N RT. As in, it was not an R/T - the available 5.9L step up from the trim that I had.
Then, on my Scion, I had SLO WHAT. It was slow, and I didn't care. I got tired of people making such a big deal over it.
On my 4.7L Dakota I had NOT N RT. As in, it was not an R/T - the available 5.9L step up from the trim that I had.
Then, on my Scion, I had SLO WHAT. It was slow, and I didn't care.
I got tired of people making such a big deal over it.Our license plate philosophy is similar
The Scions get great gas mileage too... which one did you have?
