iphone dynolicious

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Aug 20, 2008 | 11:15 AM

#31

HARDtoTOP

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 15,719

Likes: 0

From: Westport, MA

Aug 20, 2008 | 11:28 AM

#32

LazyProfessor

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 4,089

Likes: 0

From: Groton, Connecticut

Quote:

Originally Posted by HARDtoTOP,Aug 20 2008, 03:11 PM

0-60 in 6+ and then 1/4 mile in 12.67 at 186.5????

Sounds fishy.

Aug 20, 2008 | 11:29 AM

#33

HARDtoTOP

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 15,719

Likes: 0

From: Westport, MA

But the iPhone is the best thing since sliced bread

Aug 20, 2008 | 11:31 AM

#34

Bass

Registered User

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 39,285

Likes: 1

From: Franklin MA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaN1Nz1Dyls

touch and $30.00 bill ftw

Aug 20, 2008 | 11:34 AM

#35

HARDtoTOP

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 15,719

Likes: 0

From: Westport, MA

Aug 20, 2008 | 11:42 AM

#36

elmmx5

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 6,667

Likes: 0

From: Crack house in Norton, MA

Quote:

Originally Posted by HARDtoTOP,Aug 20 2008, 03:11 PM

0-60 in 6+ and then 1/4 mile in 12.67 at 186.5????

Sounds fishy.

It probably just calculated the average rate of acceleration and applied it to a 1/4 mile distance. I'm guessing that increasing aerodynamic drag is nowhere in that calculation. So... if you ran the 1/4 mile in a vacuum, these numbers are probably fairly accurate.