http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Honda-S2000...sspagenameZWDVW

 

I know you are just kidding

but here why it will not work . You car consumes more CFM than it can flow . It might help a small amount down low , but not worth the aggravation or humiliation

Engine airflow can be directly related to hp developed. The volumetric efficiency of an engine is always the highest at its torque peak. Above this rpm, pumping efficiency drops off. A round average for airflow vs. hp is 1.5 to 1.6 cubic feet per minute for each hp developed. If you want to work this out in mass flow, a standard cubic foot of air weighs about 0.0765 pounds on a standard 15C day. For example if we have a 4 cylinder engine developing 200hp it would be flowing around 300 SCFM or 23 lbs./min.

 

looks like the Professor from Gilligan

 

First of all, you're throwing too many big words at me. Okay... now because
I don't understand them, I'm gonna take them as disrespect. Watch your mouth.

 

As I Quote a good friend of mine Steve Bass ..........." FU "


I dont have time to type big words while doing my morning doody ...I mean Duty's .....Copy and paste

 

figured that sounded like another guy i know

 

It looks like a big hair dryer with a filter.

 

[QUOTE=Bass,Jun 6 2007, 07:53 AM]

 

"Engine airflow can be directly related to hp developed. The volumetric efficiency of an engine is always the highest at its torque peak. Above this rpm, pumping efficiency drops off. A round average for airflow vs. hp is 1.5 to 1.6 cubic feet per minute for each hp developed. If you want to work this out in mass flow, a standard cubic foot of air weighs about 0.0765 pounds on a standard 15C day. For example if we have a 4 cylinder engine developing 200hp it would be flowing around 300 SCFM or 23 lbs./min."



I think somewhere in there you said that my mother's a whore...did I get that right?

 

Riggs said

hehehe.