Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

For all you engineers out there!

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 07:56 PM
  #11  
dat boi's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,216
Likes: 5
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by espelirS2K,Feb 7 2011, 08:54 PM


So why do you keep it as x^2 even though the radius is given?!
Because the radius is changing as the rocket moves away, hence why the attraction force changes.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 07:58 PM
  #12  
espelirS2K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,670
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

I've got more than
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 08:04 PM
  #13  
espelirS2K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,670
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default



I'm doing #3. I got #1 right.

The answer to #1 ≈ 7.34 × 106 ft-lb

So for #3 I type in:

integrate (pi(12^2+(12-y)^2)(62.4)(23-y)) from 0 to 20 and I get 9.76518x10^6

the answer is ≈ 8.99 × 10^6 ft-lb

I know it has to do with how I'm calculating the radius. To calculate the radius I'm doing a triangle where x^2=r^2 which is 12^2-(12-y)^2=x^2
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 08:13 PM
  #14  
dat boi's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,216
Likes: 5
From: .
Default

What book is this from?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 08:16 PM
  #15  
espelirS2K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,670
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by dat boi,Feb 7 2011, 09:13 PM
What book is this from?
my fukn math professors head
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 08:23 PM
  #16  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

Originally Posted by espelirS2K,Feb 7 2011, 09:04 PM


I'm doing #3. I got #1 right.

The answer to #1 ≈ 7.34 × 106 ft-lb

So for #3 I type in:

integrate (pi(12^2+(12-y)^2)(62.4)(23-y)) from 0 to 20 and I get 9.76518x10^6

the answer is ≈ 8.99 × 10^6 ft-lb

I know it has to do with how I'm calculating the radius. To calculate the radius I'm doing a triangle where x^2=r^2 which is 12^2-(12-y)^2=x^2
For #3 the surface area changes with the depth. Calculate the area as a function of y, then integrate A(y)*(y+3)*density*dy.

I always encourage my students to draw a picture, showing a representative slice of thickness Δy, the mass of that slice, how far that slice has to be moved (pumped), and so on.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 08:25 PM
  #17  
espelirS2K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,670
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Why y+3 and not 23-y?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 08:32 PM
  #18  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

Originally Posted by espelirS2K,Feb 7 2011, 09:25 PM
Why y+3 and not 23-y?
I was assuming that y is measured vertically down from the top of the tank. It makes the calculation of the area of the slice a bit easier. In that case you will pump the water to the top of the tank (y) and an additional three feet.

As I wrote above: draw a picture. Define y in a way that makes it easiest for you to do the calculations.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 08:44 PM
  #19  
espelirS2K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,670
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Here's the picture I drew:





And I made the triangle where the radius was the hypotenuse and the "height" of the triangle is 12-y and the "width" of the triangle is x^2 which=r^2
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 09:11 PM
  #20  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

Here's mine:

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 PM.