When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Off-topic TalkWhere overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.
Originally Posted by espelirS2K,Feb 7 2011, 09:04 PM
I'm doing #3. I got #1 right.
The answer to #1 ≈ 7.34 × 106 ft-lb
So for #3 I type in:
integrate (pi(12^2+(12-y)^2)(62.4)(23-y)) from 0 to 20 and I get 9.76518x10^6
the answer is ≈ 8.99 × 10^6 ft-lb
I know it has to do with how I'm calculating the radius. To calculate the radius I'm doing a triangle where x^2=r^2 which is 12^2-(12-y)^2=x^2
For #3 the surface area changes with the depth. Calculate the area as a function of y, then integrate A(y)*(y+3)*density*dy.
I always encourage my students to draw a picture, showing a representative slice of thickness Δy, the mass of that slice, how far that slice has to be moved (pumped), and so on.
Originally Posted by espelirS2K,Feb 7 2011, 09:25 PM
Why y+3 and not 23-y?
I was assuming that y is measured vertically down from the top of the tank. It makes the calculation of the area of the slice a bit easier. In that case you will pump the water to the top of the tank (y) and an additional three feet.
As I wrote above: draw a picture. Define y in a way that makes it easiest for you to do the calculations.