Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

any runners in here?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 02:12 PM
  #11  
EVAN&MONICA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 22,535
Likes: 0
From: Portlandia
Default

Just got some Pumas I usually prefer new balances for running but these pumas are just as nice
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 02:22 PM
  #12  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

In training for endurance riding and Ride and Tie I run both on trail and on asphalt / concrete. I wear Ariat Terrains. They're comfortable, light-weight, and well-cushioned. I've had cadaver graft replacements for both ACLs for 13 years and 15 years - right and left respectively - and can run for miles on rough trails, DG, asphalt, and concrete with no difficulties whatsoever.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 05:17 PM
  #13  
triman54's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,040
Likes: 0
From: Winter Springs, Fl.
Default

I have run since high school and in college. I have done several marathons and I compete in about 10 to 12 triathlons each year, including usually 2 half-Iron distance runs. My advice would be to go to a reputable running or tri-store and try out the different models. If you are running longer distances, that effects the type show you wear. If you supinate or pronate, that has an effect. I train in Mizuno Wave-Creations, and I race in Saucony racing flats at distances up to 10K. If I race beyond that distance, I run in my Mizunos. Costs mean less than fit. My Mizunos cost about $120.00, and I have two pairs that I rotate. I never put more than 350 miles on a pair of shoes. Racing flats cost $80.00. They are lighter, but cost less than my trainers. I am not devoted to a particular brand, but once I found a pair of training shoes and racing shoes, I got to the point where I was not likely to change. There is a light to consider...for instance in up to Olympic distance triathlons, I don't wear socks because it adds time in transition. So in a 10K run, I need a shoe that won't blister. Thus, the answer to the question "Which shoe to get?"...is, it depends.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 05:06 AM
  #14  
my2ks2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
From: nc
Default

Originally Posted by sillyboybmxer,Jul 14 2008, 01:57 PM
i have a new balance store near by but are they actually "trained" on this or would it be better to go to a podiatrist and have custom made insoles made??? ????
i was actually gonna get the new balance 992's for my next pair as i have tried them on and felt they were the most comfortable.
i might add that i probably do have somewhat "flat" feet as i have been in old skool vans forever and i find anything with a visable arch support uncomfortable.
i would advise against going to a new balance store, just because they are obviously going to only choose between their brand, and NB may not offer the best shoe for you. go to a dedicated running store like one of those mentioned (run for your life is a great store in my area) and let them analyze your style. typically they'll watch you walk, watch you run, then bring out 4 or 5 pairs for you to try out (run for your life has a treadmill in the store to try them on.)
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 06:46 AM
  #15  
2002S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
From: Red Bank
Default

I swear by the Brooks Adrenaline GTS, I am on my 12th pair or so and whenever I find them on sale I stock up...My fiance was having foot/knee issues and I told her to give them a try, she's on her 4th pair or so now.

I agree with Triguy that it really depends on your foot shape, etc but these seem to be a solid all around shoe. I also devote the shoes only to running and will cycle them every 3-6 months depending on my mileage.

I run a decent amount of miles, mainly on the road and these shoes have just the right amount of support and cushion. They always get great writeups and I feel that Brooks really goes for the true running crowd where Nike and a few others know less than 10% of their shoes will ever be run in and go more for style.

Here's the linky... http://www.roadrunnersports.com/rrs/products/BRK932/

These are the newest ones, you can usually find the previous model which is basically the same just with different colors for half price if you look around.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 09:59 AM
  #16  
mns2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,193
Likes: 0
From: Denton, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by sillyboybmxer,Jul 14 2008, 11:26 AM
i run alot but i have no luck with shoes.

nike shox dont really feel good as they have no cushion in the front.
Nike Air max air pockets pop on me

i had better luck with my Puma casual shoes

price is not an issue.
Interesting comment on the Nikes. I have used the AirMax 360's with out issue for years. Have never had a blow out. I am a heavy runner and my route is all concrete.

I run about 5 mi 3X/wk and trade in the shoes every 6 months.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 10:08 AM
  #17  
stockae92's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

Originally Posted by mns2k,Jul 15 2008, 09:59 AM
Interesting comment on the Nikes. I have used the AirMax 360's with out issue for years. Have never had a blow out. I am a heavy runner and my route is all concrete.

I run about 5 mi 3X/wk and trade in the shoes every 6 months.
i think you are the exact type of 360's target

"lighter" runner found the 360 to be a bit harsh and air pocket should work better with smooth and clean road surface

on the side note, i have had a pair of nike air that got punctured (by thrones on the street) within 2 weeks of running. i think i could even hear the "psssssssss" when i pull the thrones out.

since then i replaced it with a pair of adidas trail response. i still got thrones stucked at the buttom of the shoes, but all i need to do is to remove them and i am good to go

lesson here is that different shoes are for different runners, its almost impossbile to pick out a pair of running shoe without knowing the feet type/pronation, body type, running style, surface condition, etc.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 11:46 AM
  #18  
DiamondDave2005's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,897
Likes: 1
From: Cherry Hill, NJ
Default

My local store (Fleet Feet) figured out what I needed and I've been through Asics and Saucony in the past couple of years, and I'm now using Mizunos.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 12:02 PM
  #19  
f22b-dohc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 289
Likes: 1
Default

i do not run...(exercise wise)

however i do play basketball

and i agree that so far nike runners with an window have burst on me

air max (support is too hard, same with shox when i tried them)
zoom air (i zoom air w/ windows for comfort)


i use them for walking 30 min walk from the train station to work back then.

i think they burst as once in while i get lazy to change to basketball shoes on random pick up games. the shoe cannot support my ups on landing

i have never burst b-ball shoes with windows.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 04:44 PM
  #20  
AlX Boi's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,605
Likes: 4
From: Irvine, California
Default

Asics shoes are awesome. They're super light and durable. If you need another incentive to go for these, Bruce Lee wore them.

http://www.asicsamerica.com/sports/running/
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 AM.