Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Bloodhound SSC: 1,000 mph

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 03:56 PM
  #11  
ahrmike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Steponme,Jul 20 2010, 01:24 PM
Says who? To be a "car", it has to have wheels, not necessarily tires. Tires would disintegrate at such high speeds.
sorry, i used tires/wheels interchangeably. its basically a tire/wheel combo
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 07:14 PM
  #12  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by MikeyCB,Jul 20 2010, 10:07 PM
I've always thought that the key to going fast underwater was to project some sort of gas in front of the craft so there is less friction and resistance from the water. I haven't seen anyone actually do anything with my theory though, since it's been a casual and informal one - but it's mine, nonetheless

Instead of thinking that the body work needs to withstand 12 tonnes / square meter, maybe we should be looking at how to make the pressure on the body work be less.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercavitation
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 09:56 AM
  #13  
don2007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Wow crazy. Who do you think they will find to drive that thing?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 10:13 AM
  #14  
The Raptor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,376
Likes: 1,618
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

Originally Posted by don2007,Jul 21 2010, 10:56 AM
Wow crazy. Who do you think they will find to drive that thing?
Andy Green, RAF pilot.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #15  
GateCrasher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11,078
Likes: 1
From: Here
Default

Needs some high speed sweepers

Very Cool, I can't imagine objects passing by at 1000mph!
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 11:32 AM
  #16  
MikeyCB's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,409
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

Originally Posted by Incubus,Jul 20 2010, 09:14 PM
What the F. I've never done research in this area or anything so i'm quite certain I didn't get the idea from somewhere else, because the term sounds completely unfamiliar. But who knows!

Anyway, thanks for the link Interesting!
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 11:37 AM
  #17  
ace123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by MikeyCB,Jul 20 2010, 04:07 PM
I've always thought that the key to going fast underwater was to project some sort of gas in front of the craft so there is less friction and resistance from the water. I haven't seen anyone actually do anything with my theory though, since it's been a casual and informal one - but it's mine, nonetheless

Instead of thinking that the body work needs to withstand 12 tonnes / square meter, maybe we should be looking at how to make the pressure on the body work be less.
Assuming short tons, that's a surface pressure of 15 psi. To manage that, this land-plane just has to use rather thick composite laminate (or whatever) with a well designed reinforcing frame. That's not too hard since power to weight doesn't much matter.

Power to drag will dominate everything. This is really an exercise in aerodynamics. Cutting the surface pressure would certainly be good, but the big payoff would come if they could reduce aerodynamic drag, regardless of peak and nominal pressure levels.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 09:58 AM
  #18  
Will's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 1
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by don2007,Jul 21 2010, 09:56 AM
Wow crazy. Who do you think they will find to drive that thing?
Richard Hammond?





Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 10:22 AM
  #19  
Traveldude's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Default

This is cool, but I have one question- aren't 2 runs required in order to get an official land speed record?

If yes, then is the rocket going to only consume half of its fuel per run, or will they have to refuel it?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 01:31 PM
  #20  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by MikeyCB,Jul 21 2010, 07:32 PM
What the F. I've never done research in this area or anything so i'm quite certain I didn't get the idea from somewhere else, because the term sounds completely unfamiliar. But who knows!

Anyway, thanks for the link Interesting!
Yeah, that's what I tell my boss when I'm busted for copying someone's ideas.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:56 AM.