Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

California Emission Laws...

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 12:48 PM
  #11  
ltweintz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 18,759
Likes: 0
From: Wheeler Army Airfield, HI
Default

Toluene. I've worked with that stuff. NASTY!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 12:57 PM
  #12  
The Raptor's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,375
Likes: 1,618
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

Yes it is. benzene is worse. I didn't do a very good job of explaining myself. The reason I smelled MTBE for the first time Thursday was because it was residing in the subsurface soil and soil vapor in chemical isolation, in the absence of any other VOC, per my onsite mobile laboratory.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 01:41 PM
  #13  
baxdatass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
From: Saclemente
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by bayarea408
[B]

have you seen the gas prices, in the LA area or Bay Area?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 02:50 PM
  #14  
JT-KGY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Alhambra
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Raptor
[B]California is phasing out methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), an octane-enhancing oxygenate gasoline additive and a chlorinated hydrocarbon volatile organic compound (VOC), a suspected carcinogen.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 03:11 PM
  #15  
The Raptor's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,375
Likes: 1,618
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

All refined gasoline contains many different VOCs. I'm only familiar with California, but my understanding is that most of the rest of the US uses MTBE in the refining process. I can't speak to the tuning/ECU stuff.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 09:29 PM
  #16  
baxdatass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
From: Saclemente
Default

I'm not sure that I completely understand this whole mtbe thing or not. Is it better to run the 91 octane that we get here in so cal? or the 95 octane that you can get just about anywhere else in the country?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 09:40 PM
  #17  
tokyo_james's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 65,827
Likes: 2
From: FCUK
Default

As I understand it, from a tuning point of view, you can run a higher compression ratio with higher octane. In Japan we are advised to use "high octain" fuel rather than standard fuel as this avoids "pinking" in the engine, or pre-ignition of the fuel. If you run lower octain the fuel actually combusts fractionally earlier then the completion of the compression stroke.....

(I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong with that understanding )
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2002 | 09:53 PM
  #18  
bayarea408's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,594
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

i dont really think you will seriously notice a difference from 91 octane to 95 octane.
the significance is soo small.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 03:09 PM
  #19  
baxdatass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
From: Saclemente
Default

Originally posted by bayarea408
i dont really think you will seriously notice a difference from 91 octane to 95 octane.
the significance is soo small.
You are probably right. Maybe you can't notice the difference but that still doesn't avoid the fact that it's better for your engine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kgf3076
Off-topic Talk
3
Feb 13, 2011 06:44 AM
mYuuki
Off-topic Talk
5
May 20, 2002 10:18 AM
brandonb
Off-topic Talk
31
Sep 12, 2001 03:39 PM
MarkS2K
Off-topic Talk
8
Jun 1, 2001 09:53 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:15 PM.