Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Camcorder

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 01:46 PM
  #1  
TonyY510's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: Oakland, California
Default Camcorder

im in the process of purchasing a camcorder and i wanted to know how many of you have one and has great quality making vids. I borrowed my friends digital 8 740 and once i exported to my cpu the quality was horrible. Thanks
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 03:29 PM
  #2  
Penforhire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Default

I use DV (Sony TRV17) and quality is awesome, limited only by the codec settings when I export from Adobe Premiere. Maybe you're playing uncompressed files and your system isn't fast enough to do that (most home PC's can't play the raw DV file, or uncompressed AVI, even from the hard drive). Try using your video edit software to encode the video at a lower bitrate and/or resolution.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 04:16 PM
  #3  
TonyY510's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: Oakland, California
Default

well my cpu is a vaio rx680g and i think its more than capable of handling the file. The cam on the other hand when stretched to 640by*** resolution was garbage.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 05:29 PM
  #4  
Hunter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Default

I would suggest you stay ahead of the trend if you can andgo with a 3 chip mini dv format. Mini DV will be the best as you can download this to you computer, however, 3 chip will give you the best color and lighting. It is also considered Prosumer. Great to mount in your S for road trips and races too! Heres a link to the one I bought:

http://catalog2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/s...rfModel=PV-GS70
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #5  
TonyY510's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: Oakland, California
Default

whoa nice camcorder, i see the specs on the still picture capability of 1280x960 with 3 mega pixels and thats great. On the other hand i dont or cant tell how the resolution is when recording and how much it can be stretched on a cpu, since you have one how is it??? Thanks
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 10:46 PM
  #6  
Sakred's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: LA / OC (Irvine)
Default

i have a sony trv-33 and man its the greatest camera i have ever owned. the quality on it is better then any dvd i have seen. though the digital stills are only 1.3 mega pixel i never really bought it for that anyways. coolest thing its its completely touch screen.

Hammad
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 08:55 AM
  #7  
Penforhire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Default

The problem I'm talking about is not CPU-based. It is the speed of data transfer from the hard drive or CD-ROM, depending on where you play it from. Like I said, no home PC can handle uncompressed video files.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redleader
Off-topic Talk
3
Apr 29, 2003 06:00 PM
meat
Off-topic Talk
10
Mar 1, 2003 09:25 PM
lucid
Off-topic Talk
5
Jul 15, 2002 04:49 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 PM.