CASE DISMISSED
I also don't understand why the dismissal of Kobe's case indicates that he feels he is above the law. That may or may not be the case (it probably is true IMO), but still, how does that follow from his case getting dismissed?
If anything, it seems that the rules of the law were applied in this case, and they came up short. The prosecution didn't have a strong case to begin with, then the various leaks and mishandled documents came along, and finally the accuser didn't want to move forward anymore. Those developments are a function of the legal system and other things out of the defendant's control.
Although being worshipped as gods may be a very real issue with athletes, how are the events that led to the case dismissal related to Kobe's ego?
If anything, it seems that the rules of the law were applied in this case, and they came up short. The prosecution didn't have a strong case to begin with, then the various leaks and mishandled documents came along, and finally the accuser didn't want to move forward anymore. Those developments are a function of the legal system and other things out of the defendant's control.
Although being worshipped as gods may be a very real issue with athletes, how are the events that led to the case dismissal related to Kobe's ego?
agreed. But usually policitians and CEOs are smart enough to realize what mistakes they could make which would cause them to loose everything. Young kids getting millions at 19 years old do not have this maturity or common sense. Not to mention that you become a CEO or politician based solely on brain power (and lots of luck). Brain power or common sense is not a pre-requisite to balling and this fact is reinforced routinely. Child actors... no comment!
Originally Posted by cyber_x,Sep 2 2004, 03:31 PM
Although being worshipped as gods may be a very real issue with athletes, how are the events that led to the case dismissal related to Kobe's ego?
Originally Posted by jmc1971,Sep 2 2004, 05:14 AM
So you think the problem is that he was richer than the wife? Um, you seem to be overlooking the fact that he cheated on his wife and family. Then there's the added insult to her that the whole world found out about it and has been talking about it since last summer.
He and any other celebrity should realize that one consequence of being a cheating SOB is that you might find yourself in trouble like this.
As far as the wife goes, adultery is a pretty good reason to divorce him. He's not an innocent wealthy man being fleeced by some scheming woman. He's an idiot. And if he didn't do a pre-nup, then he's an extraordinary idiot.
Karma's a bitch--as he's already found out. FWIW, I don't think he assaulted that girl, but I guess the only ones who will ever really know are the two of them.
As far as the wife goes, adultery is a pretty good reason to divorce him. He's not an innocent wealthy man being fleeced by some scheming woman. He's an idiot. And if he didn't do a pre-nup, then he's an extraordinary idiot.
Karma's a bitch--as he's already found out. FWIW, I don't think he assaulted that girl, but I guess the only ones who will ever really know are the two of them.
Originally Posted by VTEC_Junkie,Sep 2 2004, 04:53 PM
it just seems somewhat absurd that just because your husband/wife is wealthy, a divorce as a result of adultery will grant you more, whereas if your husband/wife was poor, a divorce as a result of adultery will grant you significantly less. the bottom line is that adultery is adultery.
Why treat the wealthy any differently?
Originally Posted by suvh8r,Sep 2 2004, 12:33 PM
Brain power or common sense is not a pre-requisite to balling and this fact is reinforced routinely. Child actors... no comment!
Originally Posted by jmc1971,Sep 2 2004, 02:21 PM
The bottom line is that, absent a pre-nup, the court divides the assets based on the state statutes. Some families have a lot more assets to divide, some have a lot less. Consequently, a poor man's wife will receive less in a divorce than will a rich man's wife. Very simple concept.
Why treat the wealthy any differently?
Why treat the wealthy any differently?
Originally Posted by watchyosix,Sep 2 2004, 05:24 PM
I'd have to disagree. Playing a sport takes much discipline, cooperation, and team work-assets which I believe are needed in the workforce. Many people (women included) of various incomes have committed adultery or have thought about this moral crime. This controversy wasn't caused by the lack of common sense. Some people are just really, really horny. 


Discipline, cooperation, and team work have nothing to do with someone's inteligence. Those traits can be found for people laying rail road as well. Some atheletes don't need discipline with the all of the given talent that they have. The biggest gripe against the NBA is the lack of teamwork. Thankfully detroit won the Championship which maybe start to change the league for the better!


