Dan Rather interviews Saddam Hussein
A reporter from CNN interviewed Saddam 10 years ago during the gulf war. The Iraqis are more than happy to let an American reporter come talk to Saddam because it gives them a chance to spread their propaganda. Just because Dan Rather can talk to Saddam doesn't mean that a navy SEAL team could just walk up to him on the street.
Bush has nothing to gain by debating Hussain. How can you debate with a murdering, lying, genocidal dictator?
I can see how it would go.
Bush : " Do you have weapons of mass destruction or not?"
Saddam: " No we do not"
Bush: "But we have these satellite photos and spy reports here showing you do"
Saddam: "Those are all fabrications by the Great Satan. Allah will prove us right"
It becomes a "Yes you do - No I don't you imperialist pig argument" very quickly.
Here's hoping we hit them soon before some Al-Queda wacko lights off one of Saddam's nerve gas bombs (he swears he doesn't have) in Times Square. The everyone would be screaming why the hell didn't we attack when we knew he had them all along.
Bush can't make the liberal opposition happy either way. Attack now and be the Cowboy, don't attack and be the idiot later when some terrorist we could have stopped kills 10,000 Americans.
I can see how it would go.
Bush : " Do you have weapons of mass destruction or not?"
Saddam: " No we do not"
Bush: "But we have these satellite photos and spy reports here showing you do"
Saddam: "Those are all fabrications by the Great Satan. Allah will prove us right"
It becomes a "Yes you do - No I don't you imperialist pig argument" very quickly.
Here's hoping we hit them soon before some Al-Queda wacko lights off one of Saddam's nerve gas bombs (he swears he doesn't have) in Times Square. The everyone would be screaming why the hell didn't we attack when we knew he had them all along.
Bush can't make the liberal opposition happy either way. Attack now and be the Cowboy, don't attack and be the idiot later when some terrorist we could have stopped kills 10,000 Americans.
So killing hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of innocent Iraqis is better than a *possibility* of an attack that might end the lives of 10,000 Americans?
Not only that, but I think we're all forgetting that this war will set a precedent that will result in enormous consequences. If we go to war with a country because it poses a threat to us, other nations all over the globe can simply point the finger at the 2003 Gulf War and say "America did it, why can't we?". India & Pakistan, Israel & Palestine, and North Korea & Japan... I can't predict the future but, chances are, the shit will hit the fan.
I'll just get off my soapbox now before another moderator comes in here and decides this thread is too political.
Not only that, but I think we're all forgetting that this war will set a precedent that will result in enormous consequences. If we go to war with a country because it poses a threat to us, other nations all over the globe can simply point the finger at the 2003 Gulf War and say "America did it, why can't we?". India & Pakistan, Israel & Palestine, and North Korea & Japan... I can't predict the future but, chances are, the shit will hit the fan.
I'll just get off my soapbox now before another moderator comes in here and decides this thread is too political.
Originally posted by Lee355
So killing hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of innocent Iraqis is better than a *possibility* of an attack that might end the lives of 10,000 Americans?
.
So killing hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of innocent Iraqis is better than a *possibility* of an attack that might end the lives of 10,000 Americans?
.
Yes. I am an American and I watch out for Americans first. Al-Queda killed how many innocent Americans 9/11? Saddam would gas our kids in a second if he could. You can't play nice in war, you gotta play to win.
I'll shut my yap too before the moderators shut us down.
Originally posted by TrojanHorse
I think you exaggerate the civilian casualties quite a bit but the answer to your question is...
I think you exaggerate the civilian casualties quite a bit but the answer to your question is...




