Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Digital Cameras

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 07:43 AM
  #1  
kmp5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: Beverly Hills
Default Digital Cameras

I've noticed some incredible pictures on this site- I'm sure in no small part due to the photographer, but a nice camera can't hurt.

I'm looking for a nice digital camera that I can buy underwater housing for. My main uses will be pictures of people, cars of course, maybe some panoramic shots and for underwater as well. I would like something that is easy to use and also is small enough to fit in my purse.

What kinds of specifications should I look for like pixels, zoom, etc.? There is a plethora of options out there.... I am completely overwhelmed.

Thank you for your input!!
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 10:38 AM
  #2  
wLim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring
Default

First thing to be aware of is the underwater housing can be as expensive or more expensive than the camera itself. So basically, pick your camera price and double it! That said, if you're just looking for something pocketable, I'd look at the Canon S series (S40, S45, S50, etc.) They're really quite nice for a little camera. I believe there may be an underwater housing option for the Canon A series (A70, A75, etc.) as well, though I'm not positive. The A series has really come a long way, and is great for the money. Now if you wanted to take some serious pictures, look no further than the Canon 20D -- or pick up a used Canon 10D (~$800 these days). You'll need a lens (or three) and the housing's over $1k, but you get what you pay for!
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 10:39 AM
  #3  
mvf4s's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: north
Default

underwater housings will be your limitation.

canon, minolta makes housings for some of their cams.

3~5megapixel is more than enough for 8x10.

please check dpreview.com for comparisons.

oh and stay away from sony and their memory stick.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 06:19 PM
  #4  
SEVNT4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,537
Likes: 0
From: Intercontinental
Default



DP Review

Canon makes some great cameras in general. I have the Canon G5 and it's good but the G6 (newer model) is getting good reviews. It's not tiny though but check it out. It's reasonably priced but has a lot of features that more expensive camera would offer.

Also, check out their powershot series too which are slim, high quality and affordable. Take a look at the reviews and sample shots from each camera. That'll help you figure out what you like.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 06:44 PM
  #5  
s2kbrian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, GA
Default

canon a85
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 01:21 AM
  #6  
flitcroft's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Kristin - I could go on for days if you care to listen... Samy's on Fairfax, South of 3rd, is one of the best camera shops in the country, btw. Definitely take advantage of them (www.samys.com - and they have easy parking ).

What price range are you looking at? The pictures that make your jaw drop are usually taken with good glass. Great photographers and bad optics don't produce great results most of the time.

How often do you think you'll use your camera underwater? I'd bet that you can rent a great underwater setup from Samy's, save money (depending on frequency of dives) by focusing on a standard camera, and get better results both above and below water.

Another option opening up is to buy a better camera that is not new. Digital cameras lose value by the nanosecond. You can now pickup some great featured, perfect condition-glass cameras in the secondhand market.

What kinds of specifications should I look for like pixels, zoom, etc.?
This is trouble. Pixel count helps for making larger prints, but it is not a determinant of quality. You'd be amazed at how bad some high-megapixel cameras actually are in a controlled studio environment. Zoom is not that important in a camera, but on a fixed lens camera you'll want something with at least 2x-3x optical zoom.

I shoot professionally with a 4mp Canon G2. It's a superb camera, but 4mp is a bit smaller than I'd like these days. It's around $300 on eBay.

Here's some pictures:
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?act=m...lbum&album=8575


And ditto on DPreview.com, although there are so many cameras now that it's not a whole lot of help when you're just starting to look.

Edit: that shot's not particularly great, but it's hard on the camera. I was trying to show good tonal range in low light, even exposure, and the glass-like water. Many digital cameras will mess up that shot severely, if they'll even allow you to keep the shutter open that long.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 11:16 AM
  #7  
SEVNT4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,537
Likes: 0
From: Intercontinental
Default

flitcroft, that's a nice shot nonetheless. It's the Getty Center right?

Agree with your comments too and Samys is a great brick and mortar (not the cheapest but I think they'll price match). Low "noise" is one of the biggest reasons in factoring in which camera to buy in terms of clear, non-grainy, shots. That's usually the first place i start looking.

So ready to buy a Canon 20D but I'll wait a bit until the new Nikon comes out (whenever that'll be to compete and drop prices).
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 8, 2004 | 11:21 AM
  #8  
SEVNT4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,537
Likes: 0
From: Intercontinental
Default

Just clicked on your album link and realized it is the Getty. Great shots!

I have a reverse day shot of this...

Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 03:00 PM
  #9  
S2KANDRE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,088
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by 01NFRs2k,Dec 7 2004, 07:44 PM
canon a85
is this really a good camera? i really want it, but ive heard the zoom isnt too good... and yada yada
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 05:00 PM
  #10  
BPUKiller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

My brother and I have had tons of canon cameras ranging from the S400 to the D10. I've also had sonys. I think after thousands of dollars I'm going to make the switch to Nikon after talking to several people. From what I hear the have better lightmeters and the focus is superior to Canon. With a canon you seem to never know what it is focusing on, bad for me since my printer can print up to A3 sizes and small mistakes are just magnified. BTW my sony takes terrible pictures, not so far as resolution, but I always have to fix the contrast and color with photoshop.

Sam
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iNetForce
Off-topic Talk
11
Mar 12, 2006 02:08 PM
MrForgetable
Off-topic Talk
5
Nov 13, 2004 07:52 PM
djohnston
Off-topic Talk
10
Jun 17, 2003 07:55 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:57 AM.