Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

family pics or child pr0n?

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 11:57 PM
  #1  
shotiable's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 3
From: sunny suisun
Default family pics or child pr0n?

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/arizona-couple-s...tory?id=8624533

For A.J. and Lisa Demaree, the photos they snapped of their young daughters were innocent and sweet.

But after a photo developer at Walmart thought otherwise, the Demarees found themselves in a yearlong battle to prove they were not child pornographers.

"I don't' understand it at all," A.J. Demaree told "Good Morning America" Monday. "Ninety-nine percent of the families in America have these exact same photos."

The eight photos in question were among a batch of 144 family photos the Demarees had taken to their local Walmart. The developer alerted the police and the investigation into child pornography began in earnest, even though the parents maintained they were innocent bath time photos.

The Peoria, Ariz., couple had their home searched by police and worse, their children -- then ages 18 months, 4 and 5 -- were taken from them for more than month. Their names were placed on a sex offender registry for a time, and Lisa Demaree was suspended from her school job for a year. The couple said they have spent $75,000 on legal bills.

A report issued by local authorities described the photos as "child erotica" and "sex exploitation," the couple's lawyer Dick Treon told "Good Morning America." He said the person responsible for the report was unqualified to make such judgments.

The Demarees are now sharing a few of the photos with the public, he said, so the "truth to catch up with the lie."

"These photos were never intended for anyone to see except for family members," Treon said. "Perversion is in the eye of the viewer."

Eventually, a judge threw out charges against the Demarees, but now they're going on the legal offensive by suing the state, the city and Walmart for their role in what they call a "nightmare."

"I think that we need to have an awareness of how our innocent photographs can be misconstrued and misperceived," Lisa Demaree said.
Cliff notes:
couple snaps pictures of kids in the bath
they take them to their local wal mart to be developed
walmart employee sees pics and says its child pr0n!!! calls the cops
mom and dad get harassed by the cops, kids taken away for 1 month
mom gets suspended from work for a year
judges deems that the photos are not child pr0n
mom and dad sue walmart and the city for harrassing them

i realize people that work at wal mart are stupid but i didn't know they were that incredibly stupid.

end rant/

henceforth i shall only go to walmart to buy my mobil1 oil... target is going to get my business now lololol
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 04:48 AM
  #2  
Quikie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,866
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, Mo
Default



I hope they get a good chunk of change as result of the suit they filed against Walmart.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 04:52 AM
  #3  
beanseff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
Default

wtf is wrong with these people, hell i have pictures of me when i was a baby/kid in the tub, nothing is wrong with that
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 04:59 AM
  #4  
Vadster's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 231,381
Likes: 5,250
From: Tain-uh-see
Default

Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 05:18 AM
  #5  
MikeyCB's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,409
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

Wow amazing.

I understand the WalMart kid probably thought they were doing the right thing, but that's crazy.

I think most of us have seen some kind of naked child pictures of ourselves in the tub or at bathtime.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 05:27 AM
  #6  
k24accord's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 1
From: Miami, FL
Default

another factor to consider is the police dept that actually filed the charges.

while it sucks for the family and i sympathize with them, i doubt the case will hold a candle in court. most u.s businesses that develop photo's are required to report anything suspicious, so if anything they can chalk this one up to following the rules.

more then likely itll settle out of court and they will something decent, although not the xx millions im sure theyre suing for.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 05:28 AM
  #7  
BearNVa's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 0
From: Fajardo
Default

Once again nosy ass people puttin there face where it don't belong!
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 05:45 AM
  #8  
The Gasman's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 59,195
Likes: 1
From: Ventura, California, USA
Default

Originally Posted by quiksilverS2K,Sep 25 2009, 04:48 AM


I hope they get a good chunk of change as result of the suit they filed against Walmart.
Luckily that didn't happen to me. I'd be in jail or dead. No one would take my kids from me for a month.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 06:36 AM
  #9  
GateCrasher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11,078
Likes: 1
From: Here
Default

Just adding to the long list of reasons why I do not go to Walmart.

Must have been a nightmare for the kids and parents when they were running the sexual abuse tests, and then having CPS take their kids away for a month!!
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 06:40 AM
  #10  
GateCrasher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11,078
Likes: 1
From: Here
Default

Originally Posted by s2000raj,Sep 25 2009, 08:45 AM
Luckily that didn't happen to me. I'd be in jail or dead. No one would take my kids from me for a month.
I'm leaning towards Dead.

I can only imagine the wrath of Raj.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:30 AM.