View Poll Results: The Future of Broadband. Which type is going to win?
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll
The Future of Broadband. Which type is going to win?
[QUOTE]Originally posted by pellisS2k
[B]The good thing about wireless(like directTV) is that they have very little investment at the customer site.theres also no infrastructure from the towers/satellites to the client.
[B]The good thing about wireless(like directTV) is that they have very little investment at the customer site.theres also no infrastructure from the towers/satellites to the client.
Eventually bluetooth will start to work. Then wireless boradband will be in place. Right now, its gonna be cable and DSL.
DSL - can go in existing infrastructure, but limitted coverage area
Cable - Company must upgrade to fiber lines (many are doing to compete with satelite anyway)
DSL - can go in existing infrastructure, but limitted coverage area
Cable - Company must upgrade to fiber lines (many are doing to compete with satelite anyway)
Originally posted by krazik
The bad thing about satellite is latency.
The bad thing about satellite is latency.
True, but latency isnt that important for 95% of home use. The only place it really comes into play is gaming where you need the near-realtime response.
Originally posted by gabedude
Eventually bluetooth will start to work.
Eventually bluetooth will start to work.
Bluetooth is a very short distance wireless technology which allows electronic devices to exchange data, say within the same room. It's not applicable as a broadband communications technology.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by pellisS2k
[B]The good thing about wireless(like directTV) is that they have very little investment at the customer site.theres also no infrastructure from the towers/satellites to the client.
[B]The good thing about wireless(like directTV) is that they have very little investment at the customer site.theres also no infrastructure from the towers/satellites to the client.

















