Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

How the average US consumer spends their paycheck

Old Feb 3, 2010 | 07:32 AM
  #21  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by mxt_77,Feb 3 2010, 03:51 AM
I don't know about my total tax (including Medicare, sales tax, etc), but for my federal income tax, my effective tax rate only ends up being about 13-14% of my gross income once deductions and other things are factored in.

But I agree with your other point, most people probably are living in the red, or paycheck-to-paycheck.
state + fed tax = ~30% of gross...talk about being bent over
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 07:44 AM
  #22  
vader1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,950
Likes: 474
From: MAHT-O-MEDI
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Feb 3 2010, 10:32 AM
state + fed tax = ~30% of gross...talk about being bent over
A combination of probably

high income/high state tax/low deductable expenses/low retirement pretax contribution

But yeah you are getting bent over considering the stuff provided to you by the government is pretty low, and they are running up mounds of debt you will have to pay for on top of it.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 08:12 AM
  #23  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

For me, percentage of gross income:

Gross income - 100%
AGI (gross minus pre-tax investments/benefits) - 85%
Taxable income (AGI minus deductions) - 65%
Income tax (federal only, no state in Texas) - 13%
Social Security - 5.8%
Medicare - 1.4%

Housing - 10% (split between two people)
Misc household expenses - 10% (again, split)
Misc personal expenses - 20%
Savings - 25%

Total - 100.2% (okay, expenses are an estimate )
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 08:21 AM
  #24  
sahtt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by zzziippyyy,Feb 2 2010, 01:57 PM
From the article,

"These expenditures come out of an annual household income of $63,091 per year on average, before taxes"

I would venture to say 70% of the population makes less than this!

So my response would be most people have their paycheck and the next few spent before they even earn them!
This is the average not the median income. 90% of u.s. households could make less than this (mid 60's) as long as the remaining 10% were to average say 500k+ annually. The mode (income) is usually in the mid 30's if I'm not mistaken. The 2nd and 3rd quartile (inner 50% of income distributions) are probably from the high 20's to the high 30's as well.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 08:26 AM
  #25  
sahtt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fishfryer,Feb 2 2010, 07:07 PM
Things like this I think about all the time, Housing is a big waste for most people (I am guilty of this too), we tend to have have too much house. Part of that was from the saying 'that a house is your best investment', I don't know about all houses, but some I've had I barely broke even. Some have been great as far as money.

I think in the near future the number of people that grasp the concept of inflation, FOREX and investing will need to rise or else the number of people in near poverty will be out of control. My big worry is China revaluing their currency, overnight the inflation for most people will be huge, very scary.
The highly industrialized world in general spends way too much of their income on "housing". The reason for the quotations is because in reality it's "50% housing/50% debt to maintain your housing". If people were to pay cash for their homes it would be a different story.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 08:47 AM
  #26  
mxt_77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 3
From: Wylie, TX
Default

Originally Posted by sahtt,Feb 3 2010, 12:26 PM
If people were to pay cash for their homes it would be a different story.
But where are they supposed to live while they're saving up the money to pay cash for a home?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 09:17 AM
  #27  
i_heart_my_DB8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
From: Scatterbrainia
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Feb 3 2010, 09:21 AM
So that means that $4116 is not accounted for in this chart, even with taxes figures. That's not a lot of savings, but it's certainly not the paycheck-to-paycheck or in-the-red scenario some of you are talking about.
Yeah, but in my head, the average American goes out and blows the extra $4116 on a Waverunner.

It's info from 2007, but this article (particularly the graph on the first page) is pretty telling in a sad way:

http://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2007/02%20Febru...0207_saving.pdf
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 09:46 AM
  #28  
CKit's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

That's a really interesting chart.

It'd be interesting to see how those proportions shift with incomes towards the extremes.

Instead of 20.2% spent on housing, we spend 7.8%.

But instead of 6.5% spent on cars, we spend 9.1% (approximate).
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 09:54 AM
  #29  
Malloric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Incubus,Feb 2 2010, 05:47 PM
Remember, people like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett count toward this statistic. The floor is $0, but the ceiling isn't double the average.

EDIT: Your guess about 70% making less than the average is probably close, or even low. I'd say more like 80% or 90%.
Or you could look at statistics instead of guessing. Average (2007) was 78,885. 40% of the population made more than 75,000. Exactly how many people made between 75,000 and 7,885 is unknown. But with 25.8% making over $100,00 there obviously can't be 80 to 90% of people making less than the average 78,885. I highly doubt more than 5% make between 75,000 and 78,885, and that means no more than 65% make less than the average household income.

Wealth discrepancy in the US is vastly over rated. It's not equal by any means, but its not the case that a few ultra-wealthy individuals control so much wealth that 90% of people make less than the average as a result of a relative few incredibly wealthy outliers.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 09:57 AM
  #30  
pmptx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,368
Likes: 2
From: Keller, TX
Default

We are a skew also as we spend about 12.3% on housing/bills/etc, and <1% on cars as we have no pmts and insurance/maint is the only expense ( I will place fuel in a different category)
But agreed the savings is pitiful and the leverage is extreme.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:25 PM.